Monday, December 26, 2011

Minnesota Firefighter & Police Officer Disability Benefits

If you are a Minnesota firefighter or police officer, and you are hurt on the job, you may be eligible for workers’ compensation benefits, PERA/MSRS disability benefits, and health care continuation benefits under Minn. Stat. §229A.465. 

Workers’ compensation. All Minnesota firefighters and police officers, including conservation officers, corrections officers, and volunteer firefighters, are eligible for workers’ compensation benefits if you are hurt on the job. This includes medical expense benefits, wage loss benefits, permanent partial disability benefits, and rehabilitation/retraining benefits.

PERA or MSRS disability benefits. If you are a Minnesota police officer or firefighter, you may be eligible for PERA or MSRS disability benefits if you can longer perform your normal duties. Depending on the circumstances surrounding the injury, you may be eligible for duty disability benefits, which pays a base rate of 60% of your average high five salary, or regular disability benefits, which pays at a base rate of 45% of your average high five salary.

Health Care Continuation. If you are a Minnesota police officer or firefighter, and you qualify for PERA or MSRS duty disability benefits, you may also qualify for Continued Health Insurance Coverage through age 65, which means that your employer continues to pay your health insurance premium even if you can no longer work as a police officer or firefighter.

The laws governing workers’ compensation benefits and PERA disability benefits are complex. Coordinating your claims to maximize all the benefits you’re entitled to is also extremely complicated. Every case is different, particularly in terms of timing. It’s very easy to make mistakes if you are trying to pursue these benefits on your own, which can literally cost you hundreds of thousands of dollars. Often times we meet with police officers and firefighters who have no idea they’re even eligible for these benefits! We’ve met with other police officers and firefighters who had been represented by, or consulted with, an otherwise competent workers’ compensation lawyer, who had no idea how to help these folks with their claims for PERA benefits.

If you’re a Minnesota police officer or firefighter who has sustained an on-the-job injury, and you’re unsure whether you will be able to continue working as a police officer or firefighter, make sure your workers’ compensation lawyer is knowledgeable about PERA, or you could be leaving hundreds of thousands of dollars on the table. Meuser & Associate is one of the few workers’ compensation law firms in the state that also handles PERA and MSRS disability claims.

If you’re a Minnesota police officer or firefighter who has sustained a career-ending injury, sitting down to talk with us about your rights to these types of benefits is literally like financial planning. We can explain what benefits you’re eligible for, and we can make recommendations to you in terms of how to best protect your rights to those benefits.

In the last couple years, Meuser & Associate has previously represented, and currently represents, dozens of police officers and firefighters throughout the state of Minnesota, including firefighters and police officers who currently work for or formerly worked for:
  • Grand Rapids Police Department 
  • Rogers Police Department
  • Minneapolis Fire Department 
  • Springfield Police Department
  • St. Louis County Sheriff’s Office 
  • St. Paul Fire Department 
  • Crookston Police Department 
  • Redwood Falls Police Department 
  • Hamel Fire Department 
  • Waseca Police Department 
  • Crystal Police Department 
  • St. Louis Park Fire Department 
  • Faribault Police Department 
  • Minneapolis Police Department 
  • Coon Rapids Fire Department 
  • Plymouth Police Department 
  • New Brighton Police Department 
  • Mound Fire Department 
  • Pine County Sheriff’s Office 
  • Rochester Police Department 
  • South St. Paul Fire Department 
  • Becker County Sheriff’s Office 
  • Cass County Sheriff’s Office 
  • Big Lake Police Department 
  • Minnesota State Highway Patrol 
  • Woodbury Police Department 
  • Metro Transit Police Department 
  • Bemidji Police Department 
  • North Branch Police Department 
  • Oakdale Police Department 
  • Chisago County Sheriff’s Office 
  • Lakeville Police Department 
Schedule a time to sit down with Jen or Ron to discuss your injury, what benefits you’re entitled to, and the best ways to protect your rights to those benefits. We are happy to meet with you and answer any questions or concerns you have, and give you an honest assessment as to what benefits you’re eligible for, and our recommendations as to how you should proceed. We understand that for firefighters and police officers, it’s not just a job—it’s a career, and it’s a lifestyle. Facing an illness or injury that may end your career is a difficult place to be in, and it involves making a lot of difficult choices. If you understand your rights and what benefits you’re entitled to, making some of those choices can be a little less stressful.

For a free, no-obligation consultation to discuss your workers’ compensation case, and your rights under PERA or MSRS, call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680, or click here to send us an email to schedule a time to meet with Ron or Jen. 

Sunday, December 25, 2011

Merry Christmas from Meuser & Associate!


Merry Christmas from all of us at 
Meuser & Associate!

Friday, December 23, 2011

Calculating a MN Work Comp Settlement

Under Minnesota workers’ compensation law, there is no automatic right to a lump sum settlement. That means that neither side can force the other side to settle the case. That being said, in the majority of cases, the parties can, and do, reach some kind of settlement.

There are a variety of different kinds of settlements of workers’ compensation cases, but generally, they are either full, final, complete settlements, or to-date settlements. When people want to settle their Minnesota workers’ compensation case in exchange for a lump sum payment, they are usually thinking of what is known as a full, final, complete settlement, which is a lump sum settlement of all past and future claims, which sometimes closes out an employee’s right to future medical expense benefits, or sometimes leaves open an employee’s right to future medical expense benefits.

While there are literally dozens of factors that need to be evaluated in every case before attempting to put a monetary value on the claim, generally speaking, there are several things that we calculate in every Minnesota workers’ compensation demand. The best way to get an accurate valuation of your Minnesota workers’ compensation claim is to consult with a Minnesota workers’ compensation lawyer.

Past wage loss claims: We calculate claims for any past wage loss to-date, if the workers’ compensation insurer owes any past wage loss benefits. This can include temporary total disability benefits, if the employee has been completely off work, or temporary partial disability benefits, if the employee has been working, but earning less money. In some cases, it can include past permanent total disability benefits. It can also include underpayment claims if the insurer has been paying benefits at an incorrect rate. Factors that play into this calculation include the employee’s average weekly wage and compensation rate at the time of the injury, whether or not the employee has reached maximum medical improvement or not, whether the employee has consistently had work restrictions during the relevant time periods, whether the employee has conducted a diligent job search during the relevant time periods, and whether any third parties have paid wage loss benefits during the same time periods.

Future wage loss claims: For a full, final, complete settlement demand, which contemplates a close out of future wage loss benefits, we also calculate what the employee will realistically incur in future wage losses as well. Several factors come into play in this calculation, including how many weeks of wage loss benefits the employee remains entitled to, whether or not the employee has reached maximum medical improvement, whether the employee is currently working or not working, how much longer it is anticipated that the employee will be off work, whether the employee has permanent work restrictions and the nature of those restrictions, the employee’s anticipated future earning capacity, the employee’s average weekly wage and compensation rate at the time of the injury, and whether the employee is eligible for any other wage loss benefits, such as PERA disability benefits, retirement pension benefits, or social security disability benefits.

Permanent partial disability claims: Based on the type and severity of the injury, we determine whether the employee may have claims for permanent partial disability benefits. Factors that come into play in estimating the value of permanent partial disability benefits, include the nature and extent of the injury, whether or not any permanent partial disability has already been paid, the nature and extent of any pre-existing conditions, and whether a doctor has assigned a permanent partial disability rating.

Out of pocket expenses/medical mileage: If the injured worker has incurred out of pocket expenses or medical mileage, we typically include a claim for reimbursement of these expenses.

Close out of rehabilitation/retraining benefits. Often, a full, final complete settlement also includes a close out of entitlement to rehabilitation and/or retraining benefits. While an injured worker doesn’t actually receive money for rehabilitation benefits, this is a benefit that has monetary value to the insurance company, because they pay for this benefit. If an employee is a strong candidate for retraining, which can be a costly benefit, the value of closing out this type of benefit may be higher.

Payment of outstanding medical expenses/third party intervenors. In addition to the monetary benefits claimed, normally a settlement demand directs that the insurer will also be obligated to satisfy any outstanding medical expenses, and reimburse any third party payors, such as a person's private health insurance, if any of the medical expenses have been paid by a third party. 

Close out of future medical care. In some cases, it may be appropriate to consider a close out of an employee's rights to future medical care in exchange for a monetary payment. In some cases, consideration of a close out of future care is not appropriate. This depends on a variety of factors, such as whether the underlying claim is admitted or denied, the nature and extent of the employee's injury, and the nature, extent, and expense of any anticipated future medical care.

In addition to the actual hard numbers in valuing a Minnesota workers’ compensation claim, obviously, the strengths and weaknesses of any claims or defenses must be taken into account. For example, on a workers’ compensation case where the insurer doesn’t have strong defenses to the claims, it is much more likely that an injured worker will get a settlement that is closer to the demand amount. For cases where the insurer has strong defenses to the claims, or stronger defenses on liability for the underlying injury, while the potential value of the case may be high, that must be weighed against the higher risk that the insurer will successfully defend against those claims.

Crunching the numbers on a Minnesota workers’ compensation claim can be complicated, but coming up with the numbers is actually the easy part. The harder part is determining the true value of a claim to ensure that you’re getting a fair deal on a settlement of your workers’ compensation claim. Workers that try to settle their cases on their own usually undervalue their claims, or unknowingly give up rights to valuable future benefits. Do not trust the workers’ compensation insurance company to give you a fair valuation of your claim!

The best way to ensure that you’re getting a fair deal in settling your claim is to have a Minnesota workers’ compensation lawyer assist you with the process. For a FREE, NO-OBLIGATION case consultation call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680, or click here to send us an email. We’ve been helping injured workers for over 20 years, and have recovered millions of dollars in workers' compensation benefits for our clients. We can help you get a fair settlement of your Minnesota workers’ compensation claim. 


Wednesday, December 21, 2011

How a Good MN Workers’ Compensation Lawyer Can Help You

Notifying your employer that you sustained an injury, and filing a Minnesota workers’ compensation claim when you’re hurt at work are two important first steps. If you’ve sustained a serious injury, however, one of your next steps should be to contact a good Minnesota workers’ compensation lawyer. 

While your employer and co-workers may genuinely care about your recover from a work-related injury, to the workers’ compensation insurance company, you are a liability. From day one, the workers’ compensation insurance company is closely looking at how much your injury is going to cost them, and that means that they are also looking for ways to minimize their costs.

In cases involving significant injury, extended time off work, or substantial medical expense, the workers’ compensation insurance company is going to be looking for ways to cut costs. That can be anything from sending you to an IME, denying your entitlement to medical treatment, or cutting off your wage loss benefits. Unfortunately, there are certain procedures within the Minnesota workers’ compensation system that an insurance company can use to basically set you up to make a mistake on your claim, and give them a legal basis to deny portions of your claim.

Minnesota workers’ compensation insurance adjusters know the workers’ compensation rules. Do you? Don’t rely on the adjuster to tell you what your rights are. In fact, they are not legally obligated to tell you what your rights are. The best way you can level the playing field is to have a good Minnesota workers’ compensation attorney on your side through the process.

A good Minnesota workers’ compensation lawyer can help you avoid making mistakes that will cost you benefits, they can help protect you if the insurance company tries to deny your benefits, and in most cases, a workers’ compensation lawyer can help you get a fair settlement for your claim.

In Minnesota, workers’ compensation attorney fees are contingent, meaning that the fees are based on the amount your attorney recovers on your behalf. It also means there are no fees if your attorney is unable to recover benefits on your behalf. These fees are set by Minnesota statute at 25% of the first $4,000 in benefits, and 20% thereafter, up to a maximum of $13,000 in attorney fees per injury. In certain complex cases, your attorney may petition the court to approve fees in excess of $13,000. In cases involving disputes primarily dealing with your right to medical expense benefits or rehabilitation benefits, the insurance company is responsible for paying your attorney fees called Roraff or Heaton attorney fees.

As a Minnesota worker, you have the right to a safe workplace. If you do sustain an on-the-job injury in Minnesota, make sure you receive the workers’ compensation benefits you’re entitled to. At Meuser & Associate, we have the knowledge and experience to protect your workers’ compensation rights from the first day you are injured. For a free, no-obligation case evaluation, contact us at 877-746-5680, or click here to send us an email


Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Avoiding Parking Lot Accidents During Holiday Shopping

In the weeks leading up to Christmas, shopping at malls and stores can be a nightmare. Frayed tempers, lack of parking spots, and heavy traffic can result in parking lot fender benders and pedestrian accidents. During the holiday season, it’s wise to exercise some extra caution during holiday shopping when parking and pulling out of parking spaces. The holidays can be stressful—don’t add more stress by having a parking lot accident.
  1. Park far away from the store. During holiday shopping, parking spots are hard to find, and impatient drivers can be dangerous when you’re trying to get in and out of a spot. Remote areas of the parking lot see less traffic, making it easier for you to safely back your car out when it’s time to leave. 
  2. Be observant on your way to your parking space. On your way back to your car after completing your shopping, watch for dangers, such as parents with small children and nearby cars. Seeing these dangers ahead of time can help you anticipate them when you’re backing out of your parking space. 
  3. Check your blind spots. When pulling out of your spot, check all your mirrors and blind spots. Be mindful that parents are out and about with their children who can run behind your car as you’re backing out. Use extra caution in busy parking lots. 
  4. Drive slowly. Slowing down allows you to react to in time to avoid accidents. Driving slowly when driving in parking lots, and when backing out of your space is particularly important if the weather is bad or when it’s dark out. 
  5. Be a responsible pedestrian. As you’re walking through a parking lot, stay in pedestrian-designated areas and make sure drivers see you. Avoid dashing in front of cars or behind cars that are backing out without looking. 
Even low-speed parking lot accidents can result in injuries. If you sustain injuries as a result of a parking-lot accident through no fault of your own, you may be entitled to Minnesota No-Fault Benefits, and you may be able to bring a claim for damages against the at-fault driver. For a free, no-obligation case evaluation, contact Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email to speak with one of our attorneys.

Monday, December 19, 2011

Is My Injury Work-Related? -- Minnesota Workers’ Compensation

If you’re sustained a work-related injury in Minnesota, you may be eligible for workers’ compensation benefits, including medical expense benefits, wage loss benefits, permanent partial disability benefits, and/or rehabilitation benefits.

In order to qualify for workers’ compensation benefits, you must be able to establish that your injury arose “out of and in the course and scope of employment.” The work activities must also be a substantial contributing factor to the injury.

Arising Out of the Employment 

The “arising out of” requirement is a legal causation standard. It basically means that there must be a causal connection between the employment and the injury. Generally, what this means is that you must show that a condition or incident of employment increased your exposure to potential harm beyond that of the general public or beyond your exposure to potential harm outside of work. In plain language, what this means is that the circumstances of your employment must have had something to do with the work injury.

Most on-the-job injuries satisfy this rule. There, are a few exceptions, however, where an on-the-job injury may not necessarily “arise out of’ the employment, including:

Injuries caused by “Acts of God.” Acts of God can include anything from injuries caused by disease or severe weather. There are many “exceptions” to this “exception,” however. If an employee’s work circumstances placed them at increased risk to exposure to the “Act of God,” or if an employee’s injuries sustained as a result of an “Act of God,” were worsened due to their work activities or circumstances, those injuries are generally compensable.

Injuries while “Coming or Going.” Generally speaking, if you sustain injury while on your way to work, or on your way from work, your injury is not covered for purposes of workers’ compensation. This is known as the “Coming and Going Rule.” Again, there are several exceptions to this exclusion. For example, employers are obligated to provide safe ingress to or egress from the employment premises. In plain language, that means injuries sustained on your way into or out of the workplace, such as walking to an employee parking lot, are generally covered.

Injuries due to the intentional acts of third parties. On the-job injuries that are the result of a violent act of a third party, totally unconnected with the employment, are not compensable. In most cases, however, there is at least some connection between the circumstances of the employment and the violent act, so these types of injuries are usually covered.

Idiopathic injuries. “Idiopathic” basically means spontaneous, or peculiar to the individual. Personal conditions that cause an injury at the workplace are not compensable. That being said, if the employment premises or activities aggravate or increase the risk of injury, these types of injuries can be compensable.

In the Course and Scope of Employment 

To meet the second part of the legal causation test, you must also show that the injury occurred within the period of the employment, and at a place where you could reasonable expected to be, and while you were performing your duties or something incident thereto. In plain language, this means that typically your injury must have occurred on the employer’s premises, during working hours, while performing your job duties.

There are, however, a number of exceptions to these requirements, including:

Traveling employees. Employment that requires travel involves a special set of rules. Each case is very fact specific, and involves an analysis of where the employee was at the time of the injury, what the employee was doing, and if the employee was required to be traveling as part of his or her duties.

Acts to assist others outside the employment. Generally, an act outside an employee’s regular duties, which is performed to advance the interests of the employer, is considered to be within the course of employment.

Acts of “personal comfort.” Under what is known as the “Personal Comfort Doctrine,” injuries that are sustained while an employee is attending to personal needs or comforts are generally held to be within the course of employment. This can include getting a drink of water, smoking, and using the restroom.

Horseplay. “Goofing around” or “horseplay” is generally considered to be incidental, or related to employment, and injuries that occur during such activities are generally compensable.

Violation of employer rules. Even violating an employer’s rules which results in an injury, is usually not grounds to deny benefits, unless the employee is engaged in a prohibited act at the time of the injury, and there must be a direct link between the performance of the prohibited act and the injury.

Recreational activities and employer sponsored events. Most social and recreational activities are no longer considered to be within the course of employment, unless the employee is able to show that the employer ordered or assigned the employee to participate in the program.

Injuries during lunches or breaks. Injuries that occur during a lunch break that is unpaid and off the employer’s premises are usually not covered, although there are some exceptions.

Work from home and home offices. This is becoming more and more common. Injuries sustained by employees during the actual performance of work activities while at home are generally compensable.

Substantial Contributing Factor

In addition to meeting the legal causation requirements set forth above, an employee must also show that his or her work activities were a substantial contributing factor to the development of his or her injury. There are a variety of different types of injuries that satisfy this definition, including specific injuries, Gillette-type or cumulative trauma injuries, aggravations or accelerations of a pre-existing condition, and occupational diseases. An employees work activities need not be the only cause of the condition—they need only be a substantial contributing factor.

Specific injuries. Specific injuries occur as a result of a specific incident or an accident. These are usually pretty clear. For example, falling off a ladder, sustaining a lifting injury, or being involved in a work-related motor vehicle collision are all specific incidents or events.

Cumulative trauma or Gillette-type injuries. Compensation is allowed for injuries that occur as a result of repetitive, minute trauma brought about by the performance of ordinary job duties. These types of injuries can occur over a long period of time. So long as an employee’s work activities are a substantial contributing factor to the development of the injury or condition, they are covered. Some common examples of these types of injuries include carpal tunnel syndrome or degenerative disc disease of the spine.

Aggravations or accelerations of a pre-existing condition. If an employee’s work activities substantially contribute to an aggravation or acceleration of a pre-existing condition, those conditions or injuries are compensable as well. A work-related aggravation can be temporary, or an aggravation can be permanent.

Occupational diseases. In very general terms, a disease that arises out of and in the course of employment, and which is peculiar to the occupation in which the employee is engaged, and which is not an ordinary disease of life to which the general public is equally exposed, is covered under Minnesota workers’ compensation. Occupational diseases have very specific definitions, causation requirements, and procedural rules.

Consequential injuries. Injuries that occur as a direct and natural consequence of a previous compensable injury are also, themselves, compensable. This can include conditions that develop as a medical consequence of an injury, and it can include injuries that are sustained as a legal consequence of a prior, work-related injury. For example, an injury that is sustained while doing physical therapy for a prior injury is a consequential injury. Injuries sustained as a result of a car accident on the way to a workers' compensation doctor's appointment are consequential injuries.

Psychological injuries.  Physical injuries which are occasioned by mental stimulus, and psychological injuries which are caused by a physical injury, may be covered for purposes of workers’ compensation. Psychological injuries which are occasioned by mental stimulus are not generally covered by workers’ compensation.

Some on-the-job injuries are obvious – if you fall off a ladder while performing your job duties and you sustain injuries, that’s clearly a work-related injury. If you sustain a lifting injury and hurt your back while performing your job duties, that’s clearly a work-related injury. Some work-related injuries, however, are not quite so obvious. If your injury falls into one of these "gray" areas, chances are, the workers' compensation insurer will deny your claim. Don't rely on the workers' compensation insurance company to make a "fair" determination as to whether your claim is compensable or not.

We frequently talk to individuals who sustain injuries or conditions that clearly meet the requirements of a work-related injury, but they didn't realize they had a compensable claim. If you believe you've sustained an injury that may be a result of your work activities, contact Meuser & Associate for a free, no-obligation case evaluation at 877-746-5680, or click here to send us an email

 

Workers' Comp. Resources: Guide to All 50 States

Meuser & Associate practices workers' compensation law in the state of Minnesota. Workers' compensation law varies significantly by state, meaning that every state has it's own specific laws governing the types of injuries covered and the types of benefits available. If you have a question about workers' compensation laws in a state other than Minnesota, I recommend checking out Maryland Workers' Compensation website, which includes a section setting forth basic information about the workers' compensation laws of all 50 states.

Sunday, December 18, 2011

MN Workers’ Comp: Independent Contractor or Employee?

In Minnesota, independent contractors are NOT covered for workers’ compensation benefits, including medical benefits, wage loss benefits, permanency benefits, or rehabilitation benefits. Employees, on the other hand, ARE covered for workers’ compensation.

In Minnesota, all employers are required by law to carry workers’ compensation insurance to cover their employees in the event of a work-related injury. The MN Department of Labor and Industry has a search tool to look up whether your employer carries legally-required workers’ compensation insurance.

If you’re an independent contractor and you sustain a serious on-the-job injury, medical bills and loss of income after a work injury can be financially devastating. That’s why it’s absolutely critical to have an experienced workers’ compensation attorney evaluate your case if you’re not sure whether you are an independent contractor or an employee.

Even if your employer tells you that you’re an independent contractor rather than an employee, you may still be covered for workers’ compensation. A determination as to whether you qualify as an “employee” or an “independent contractor” for purposes of workers’ compensation is a legal question that requires analysis of several different factors.

Just because your employer says you are an independent contractor doesn’t mean it’s true under the law. In fact, employers often have financial incentive to designate its employees as “independent contractors,” even though they don’t meet the legal definition for “independent contractors.” First, employers avoid paying social security and federal and state taxes for independent contractors. They also avoid contributing to state unemployment, and federal Medicare contributions. Employers in some industries may also classify their employees as independent contractors to avoid having to pay for workers’ compensation insurance coverage.

Depending on the industry you are working in, there are different factors that are analyzed in making a determination as to whether you are an independent contractor or an employee.

Don’t rely on your employer to tell you what your legal classification is! We routinely meet with employees who are hurt on the job who are told that they are independent contractors, so they are on their own for medical bills or wage loss following an injury.

Some industries where this problem is most prevalent include: 
  • Residential and commercial construction 
  • Roofing 
  • Landscaping 
  • Telecommunications installation and sales 
  • Appliance sales, delivery and installation 
  • Sales 
  • Collections 
  • Delivery 
  • Couriers 
  • Drivers 
If you were hurt on the job and you don’t know whether you’re an independent contractor or an employee, contact Meuser & Associate for a free, no-obligation case evaluation. Call us at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email to schedule a time to speak with Jen Yackley or Ron Meuser about your rights.

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Facet Joint Disorders and Back Pain: MN Workers’ Compensation

One common source of neck and back pain among our Minnesota workers’ compensation clients is facet joint disorders. Facet joints are small stabilizing joints located between and behind the vertebra of the spine. Facet joints prevent excessive motion, over-twisting, and slipping of the vertebrae. They slide on each other and are normally coated by a very low friction, moist cartilage. A small sack or capsule provides lubricant for the facet joint.

The facet joints are in almost constant motion with the spine, and they often become degenerated, or wear out, due to overuse. When facet joints become worn or the cartilage is torn, bone spurs can develop in adjacent areas. This can cause considerable pain with movement and is known as “facet joint disease” or “facet joint syndrome.”

Diagnosing facet joint problems can be difficult because the symptoms can be similar to other types of conditions, such as a herniated disc, a vertebral fracture, or a torn muscle. Symptoms of facet joint problems can include:
  • Acute episodes of neck or back pain a few times a month or year. 
  • Persistent point tenderness overlying the inflamed facet joints. 
  • Loss of spinal muscle flexibility, also known as guarding. 
  • More discomfort with backward leaning than forward leaning. 
  • Radiating pain down the buttock and the back of the upper leg. 
  • Locally radiating pain, or pain into the shoulders or upper back. 
Diagnosing facet joint problems often involves x-rays or a CT scan. Facet joint injections can also be used to diagnose a facet joint problem if a patient experiences pain relief following the injections.

There are a number of treatment options for facet joint disorders that can help with reducing the severity, persistence, and frequency of flare-ups. Conservative measure can include physical therapy and exercise, heat or cold therapy, avoiding static position, use of anti-inflammatory medications, chiropractic or osteopathic manipulation, and traction. More invasive options can include facet joint injections, facet rhizotomy, or fusion surgery.

Diagnosing facet joint problems often involves eliminating other possible causes of neck or back pain. This can be a frustrating process. It can also lead to disputes in workers’ compensation cases due to the difficulty in diagnosing the condition. As a rule, the more difficulty a condition is to diagnose, the more difficulty a patient will have securing the medical care they need from their workers’ compensation insurer.

Visit Spine-Health.com for more information about facet joint problems. 

If you’ve suffering from facet joint problems, or any other back problem, due to a work injury or your work activities, we can help make sure you get the medical care you need. We can also make sure you get the Minnesota workers’ compensation benefits you’re entitled to if you’re having difficulty doing your job because of your symptoms. For a free, no obligation consultation, contact Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

MN PERA Police & Fire Plan Disability Benefits: Things You Should Know

If you’re a Minnesota police officer or firefighter, you are eligible for disability benefits through the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) if you are unable to perform your normal job duties for a period of a year or more, as the result of an injury or illness. There are two different basic types of disability benefits, duty disability benefits, and regular disability benefits.

PERA Duty Disability Benefits: Duty disability benefits are paid at a base rate of 60% of your average monthly salary benefit during the highest five consecutive years of earnings. For each year of service credit you have in excess of 20 years, the benefit is increased by 3%. In order to qualify for “duty disability,” you must have a physical or psychological condition that is expected to prevent you from performing your normal duties as a police officer or firefighter for a period of at least a year. In addition, the disability must be the direct result of an injury incurred during, or an illness arising out of, the performance of your duties. Those duties must be specific to protecting property or safety of others, and they must present inherent dangers that are specific to police officers and firefighter.

PERA Regular Disability Benefits: Regular disability benefits are paid at a rate of 45% of your average monthly salary benefit during the highest five consecutive years of earnings. In order to qualify for regular disability benefits, you must have a physical or psychological condition that is expected to prevent you from performing your normal duties for a period of at least a year. The disability can be non-work related, or it can be the result of a work injury incurred while performing duties that are not specific to protecting property or safety, or duties that are not inherently dangerous.

If you are a Minnesota police officer or firefighter considering applying for a PERA disability benefit or a PERA retirement benefit, you should very carefully consider all your options before making a selection.

Things you should keep in mind about PERA disability benefits:
  • Not all in-the-line of duty injuries automatically qualify for PERA duty disability benefits. 
  • If you are found to be eligible for PERA duty disability benefits, you are also eligible for Continued Health Insurance Coverage under Minn. Stat. §299A.465. 
  • There are tax advantages to a PERA disability benefit versus a PERA regular retirement. 
  • You cannot apply for a PERA duty disability benefit if you are over the age of 55 and have more than 20 years of service credit. 
  • You cannot apply for PERA regular disability benefits if you are over the age of 55 and have more than 15 years of service credit. 
  • Even if you are not eligible for PERA duty disability benefits because you are over 55 and have in excess of 20 years of service credit, you are still eligible for Continuation of Health Insurance Coverage under Minn. Stat. §299A.465, if you otherwise meet the requirements for PERA duty disability benefits. 
  • If your injury was more than two years prior to the date of your application for PERA duty disability benefits, you must show that you cannot perform the duties you were performing in the 90 days prior to your application. 
  • You must procure two PERA Medical Reports from two different doctors supporting your claim for PERA disability benefits. 
  • You must apply for PERA disability benefits within 18 months from the date you end your public service. 
  • You must separate from service from a PERA covered position within 45 days of being approved for PERA disability benefits. 
  • If you are not working, you can earn up to 100% of the salary currently paid for the position between PERA disability benefits and workers’ compensation benefits. 
  • If you are re-employed, you can earn up to 125% of the salary currently paid for the position or your salary before you became disabled (whichever is higher), between your re-employment earnings, workers’ compensation benefits, and PERA disability benefits, and if you exceed 125%, your PERA benefit is reduced by $1.00 for every $3.00 earned in excess of the limit. 
Deciding which benefit to apply for, and the application process itself can be extremely confusing and complicated. Unfortunately, it’s easy to make mistakes that can cost you hundreds of thousands of dollars. 

Here are a couple examples of our recent successes:
  • We represented a Deputy Sheriff whose application for PERA duty disability benefits was denied on the basis that she was able to perform the light duty tasks she performed in the 90 days preceding her application, and that she was therefore, not disabled. We won her case at an Administrative Hearing, and subsequently were able to reach an agreement with the County as to her termination date so as to secure her a significant back award of PERA duty disability benefits, as well as Continued Health Insurance Benefits under Minn. Stat. §299A.465. We were also able to secure a substantial settlement of her workers’ compensation case. 
  • We were awarded PERA duty disability benefits and Continued Health Insurance Benefits for a Police Officer who sustained serious shoulder injuries, resulting in several shoulder surgeries, when he fell down some stairs inside an abandoned building. 
  • We secured PERA duty disability benefits and Continued Health Insurance benefits for a Police Officer who suffered a heart attack following a high speed pursuit of a drunk driver, and a physical altercation with the suspect after an on-foot pursuit. Our client had previously applied for, and been denied, PERA duty disability benefits. We were able to subsequently prove that his condition had substantially worsened in the interim, and that he was now disabled. 
  • We secured PERA duty disability benefits and Continued Health Insurance benefits for a Police Officer who developed post-traumatic stress disorder after he shot and killed a suspect in the line of duty, and was unable to return to work in law enforcement. 
  • We were awarded Continued Health Insurance benefits for a firefighter who was over the age of 55 and had in excess of 20 years of service credit, who sustained a severe low back injury after lifting an extremely obese patient during the course of a medical emergency call. 
  • We secured PERA duty disability benefits and Continued Health Insurance Benefits for a Police Officer who sustained arm and elbow injuries after an altercation with a suspect. We also secured a substantial workers’ compensation settlement for him. 
If you’re injured in the line of duty, and you’re concerned about your ability to continue working as a police officer or firefighter, it’s wise to consult with a workers’ compensation attorney who is also experienced in making claims for PERA benefits. It’s VERY easy to make mistakes on PERA claims that can result in you losing out on hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of benefits.

Jen Yackley and Ron Meuser at Meuser & Associate represent police officers and firefighters throughout the state of Minnesota for workers’ compensation and PERA disability claims. For a FREE, NO-OBLIGATION consultation to discuss your claims, call us at 952-345-2052 X.102, or click here to send us an email to schedule a time to speak with Jen or Ron.

Sunday, December 11, 2011

Jen Yackley and Ron Meuser Speak at Annual Minnesota Conservation Officer’s Association Meeting


Ron and I had the honor of being invited to speak at the Annual Minnesota Conservation Officer’s Association meeting in St. Cloud on December 1, 2011. We gave a short presentation and held a question and answer session. We also had the pleasure of meeting several conservation officers and Mr. Bruce Lawrence, president of the MNCOA.

Our talk addressed the importance of reporting your injuries, making sure you plan ahead if you're suffering from an injury or condition that may prevent you from returning to your career as a conservation officer, and hearing loss claims.  

Most members of the MNCOA are sworn law enforcement officers of the Minnesota DNR enforcement division. As peace officers, Minnesota conservation officers are subject to many of the same dangers as local police officers – injuries from altercations with suspects, injuries from dealing with dangerous individuals, injuries sustained while pursuing suspects. Conservation officers also face some unique dangers associated with performing a substantial portion of their enforcement activities outdoors – injuries from ATV and snowmobile accidents, slip and fall accidents due to rough outdoor terrain, exposure to the elements, and animal and insect bites.

Minnesota conservation officers are eligible for workers’compensation benefits, including medical benefits, wage loss benefits, permanency benefits, and rehabilitation benefits for on-the-job injuries.

As licensed peace officers, Minnesota conservation officers are also eligible for MSRS duty disability benefits and continuation of healthcare insurance under Minn. Stat. §299A.265 for in-the-line-of-duty injuries expected to prevent that officer from performing his or her normal duties for a period of a year or more. 

We STRONGLY recommend that if you are a Minnesota conservation officer, or any other peace officer in the State of Minnesota, and you have a work-related injury, and you are concerned about your ability to continue performing your job, BEFORE you make any major decisions, talk to a qualified workers’ compensation lawyer that is also knowledgeable about MSRS and PERA duty disability benefits. There are things you can do to maximize your eligibility for both your workers’ compensation benefits, and your MSRS benefits. Unfortunately, there are also simple mistakes you can make that can cost you thousands and thousands of dollars.

We are happy to provide a FREE, NO-OBLIGATION consultation to discuss your workers’ compensation benefits, as well as your eligibility for MSRS and/or PERA duty disability benefits. 

Before you make any decisions about retirement or leaving the DNR on a medical disability, talk to us! Call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email to schedule a time to speak with Jen Yackley or Ron Meuser about your rights.
Related Posts with Thumbnails