Employees who are injured on the job working for an employer who failed to carry mandatory workers’ compensation insurance may be eligible for workers’ compensation benefits through the Minnesota Special Compensation Fund.
The Minnesota Special Compensation Fund of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry is also charged with enforcing mandatory workers’ compensation overage. Recently, improved technological access and staffing changes has allowed the Special Compensation Fund to increase its enforcement efforts against uninsured employers in the state of Minnesota.
Recently, there has been a 441% increase in the number of penalties issued to employers who failed to carry mandatory workers’ compensation insurance.
The number of penalties assessed increased from 210 during fiscal year 2007 to 1,137 penalties in fiscal year 2011, and the amount of penalties collected increased from $711,941 in fiscal year 2007 to $1,684,982 in fiscal year 2011.
Penalties collected by the Special Compensation Fund go to the Assigned Risk Safety account, which provides safety grants to qualified employers for projects designed to reduce the risk of injury or illness to their employees, and to other related safety and health initiatives at the Department of Labor and Industry.
By increasing enforcement and awareness of workers’ compensation insurance coverage requirements, the Special Compensation Fund hopes to reduce the number of workers’ compensation claims involving uninsured employers, which will ultimately reduce costs to the state and taxpayers, and to employers throughout the state by lowering workers’ compensation premiums.
Meuser & Associate has represented many workers who sustained injuries on the job, only to learn that their employer failed to carry the required workers’ compensation insurance. Thankfully, through the Special Compensation Fund, the State of Minnesota provides workers’ compensation benefits to workers who are injured on the job, when their employers fail to carry workers’ compensation insurance.
All too often, however, employers who know they don’t carry the required insurance try to get their injured workers to lie about how their accident happened, or try to convince them not to make a claim. Some of these employers promise to pay the hospital bill, and some promise to pay your regular wages while you’re off work. Almost invariably, when that $3,000 emergency room bill comes, or when you need an MRI, that employer who made you promises to take care of you is nowhere to be found. Likewise, if you’re off work for more than a day or two, rest assured, after a couple days, that employer will stop returning your calls.
If you sustain a serious on-the-job injury in Minnesota, and your employer pressures you not to file a claim, there’s a good change they’re uninsured. Employers who fail to carry mandatory workers’ compensation insurance are subject to fines and penalties. If the Special Compensation Fund has to make payments to an injured worker, the uninsured employer may also be subject to a claim for reimbursement plus a significant penalty.
If your employer was cutting corners in the first place by not carrying workers’ compensation insurance, they’re almost certainly not going to be there for you if you sustain an on-the-job injury. Uninsured employers are looking out for their own interests, and if you’re injured on the job, you need to look out for your own interests. Report your work-related injury.
For a free, no-obligation Minnesota workers’ compensation case evaluation, contact Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680, or click here to send us an email to schedule an appointment with one of our attorneys.
Thursday, March 1, 2012
Sunday, February 26, 2012
Work-Related Herniated Disc: Non-Surgical Treatment Options
Low back herniated disc injuries are the most common work-related injury we see in our Minnesota workers’ compensation practice.
While a good portion of our clients do ultimately require some sort of surgery to address their herniated discs, many of our clients experience improvements in their condition, or they are able to manage their symptoms through other, non-surgical medical treatments.
During the initial time period following a lumbar herniated disc injury, many patients will try a variety of “conservative” treatments to alleviate pain from the herniated disc, and to give the disc herniation time to heal. If an injured worker experiences symptom relief with non-surgical options within the first several weeks following the disc herniated injury, continued non-surgical treatment may be appropriate.
Some types of non-surgical disc herniation treatment options include:
Chiropractic treatment and physical therapy. If symptoms persist for several weeks, a trial of chiropractic or osteopathic manipulation and/or physical therapy may be warranted. The goals of chiropractic/osteopathic manipulation and physical therapy are to reduce pain and to help the patient return to his or her normal level of function.
Medications. Medications, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can help reduce inflammation and pain caused by a disc herniation. Oral steroids may also be utilized to try to reduce inflammation promote healing of a herniated disc. Narcotic pain medications may be prescribed to reduce acute pain. Muscle relaxers may be prescribed to reduce muscle spasm, and to encourage healing in the affected area.
Epidural steroid injections. Injections of steroids directly into the area of the disc herniation can help reduce inflammation and promote healing. Patients may experience pain relief that can last from one week up to a year. Up to three injections may be done within a year.
In Minnesota, if you sustain a work-related herniated disc, the workers’ compensation insurance company is required to pay for reasonable and necessary medical expenses, which may include chiropractic treatments and physical therapy, medications, and injections, and a variety of other medical treatments.
Lumbar herniated discs can be extremely painful and can seriously interfere with your ability to work. Herniated discs are the most common work-related injury we see in our workers’ compensation practice. To learn more about your Minnesota workers’ compensation rights, call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680, or click here to send us an email to schedule a free, no-obligation case consultation.
While a good portion of our clients do ultimately require some sort of surgery to address their herniated discs, many of our clients experience improvements in their condition, or they are able to manage their symptoms through other, non-surgical medical treatments.
During the initial time period following a lumbar herniated disc injury, many patients will try a variety of “conservative” treatments to alleviate pain from the herniated disc, and to give the disc herniation time to heal. If an injured worker experiences symptom relief with non-surgical options within the first several weeks following the disc herniated injury, continued non-surgical treatment may be appropriate.
Some types of non-surgical disc herniation treatment options include:
Chiropractic treatment and physical therapy. If symptoms persist for several weeks, a trial of chiropractic or osteopathic manipulation and/or physical therapy may be warranted. The goals of chiropractic/osteopathic manipulation and physical therapy are to reduce pain and to help the patient return to his or her normal level of function.
Medications. Medications, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can help reduce inflammation and pain caused by a disc herniation. Oral steroids may also be utilized to try to reduce inflammation promote healing of a herniated disc. Narcotic pain medications may be prescribed to reduce acute pain. Muscle relaxers may be prescribed to reduce muscle spasm, and to encourage healing in the affected area.
Epidural steroid injections. Injections of steroids directly into the area of the disc herniation can help reduce inflammation and promote healing. Patients may experience pain relief that can last from one week up to a year. Up to three injections may be done within a year.
In Minnesota, if you sustain a work-related herniated disc, the workers’ compensation insurance company is required to pay for reasonable and necessary medical expenses, which may include chiropractic treatments and physical therapy, medications, and injections, and a variety of other medical treatments.
Lumbar herniated discs can be extremely painful and can seriously interfere with your ability to work. Herniated discs are the most common work-related injury we see in our workers’ compensation practice. To learn more about your Minnesota workers’ compensation rights, call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680, or click here to send us an email to schedule a free, no-obligation case consultation.
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
Work Comp. is Denying My Surgery, What Do I Do?: MN Workers' Compensation
We often get calls from folks who have Minnesota work-related injuries who find themselves in a difficult spot when the workers’ compensation insurance company refuses to authorize a proposed surgery or other recommended treatment.
A workers’ compensation insurance company frequently refuses to authorize surgeries and other medical treatment either on the basis that the proposed surgery or treatment is not reasonable or necessary, that the proposed treatment or surgery is outside the Minnesota permanent treatment parameters, or that the underlying injury is not a substantial contributing factor to your need for surgery or other medical treatment. Often times, the workers’ compensation insurer will base its denial on the findings of an Independent Medical Exam. Unless the proposed surgery is done on an emergency basis, the workers’ compensation insurer does have the right to require you to attend an Independent Medical Examination before agreeing to the proposed treatment.
No matter what the reason for the denial, don't have to simply accept it if the workers' compensation insurance company disputes your entitlement to medical care!
The rules and hoop-jumping that can go along with getting pre-approval for surgical treatment in a Minnesota workers’ compensation case can, unfortunately, substantially delay your medical care.
Where medical care is disputed in a Minnesota workers’ compensation case, particularly in disputes over pre-authorization for surgery or other treatment, there are procedures that allow many of these disputes to be heard on an expedited, or “fast-track” basis. In some cases, the injured worker can file a Request for Certification of Dispute, and a Medical Request, and the issue will be heard at the Department of Labor and Industry at an Administrative Conference. Other cases are initiated by filing a Claim Petition, and the issue is heard by a judge at the Office of Administrative Hearings.
Unfortunately, disputes over medical care are very common in Minnesota workers’ compensation cases. In fact, it’s not unusual to have multiple disputes over medical care during the course of an injured worker’s claim. When an insurance company starts disputing medical care on a workers’ compensation case, it’s usually only a matter of time before they start disputing other benefits, if they haven’t already been denied.
For a free, no-obligation case evaluation to learn more about your options when the workers’ compensation insurance company is disputing your medical care, call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email.
A workers’ compensation insurance company frequently refuses to authorize surgeries and other medical treatment either on the basis that the proposed surgery or treatment is not reasonable or necessary, that the proposed treatment or surgery is outside the Minnesota permanent treatment parameters, or that the underlying injury is not a substantial contributing factor to your need for surgery or other medical treatment. Often times, the workers’ compensation insurer will base its denial on the findings of an Independent Medical Exam. Unless the proposed surgery is done on an emergency basis, the workers’ compensation insurer does have the right to require you to attend an Independent Medical Examination before agreeing to the proposed treatment.
No matter what the reason for the denial, don't have to simply accept it if the workers' compensation insurance company disputes your entitlement to medical care!
The rules and hoop-jumping that can go along with getting pre-approval for surgical treatment in a Minnesota workers’ compensation case can, unfortunately, substantially delay your medical care.
Where medical care is disputed in a Minnesota workers’ compensation case, particularly in disputes over pre-authorization for surgery or other treatment, there are procedures that allow many of these disputes to be heard on an expedited, or “fast-track” basis. In some cases, the injured worker can file a Request for Certification of Dispute, and a Medical Request, and the issue will be heard at the Department of Labor and Industry at an Administrative Conference. Other cases are initiated by filing a Claim Petition, and the issue is heard by a judge at the Office of Administrative Hearings.
Unfortunately, disputes over medical care are very common in Minnesota workers’ compensation cases. In fact, it’s not unusual to have multiple disputes over medical care during the course of an injured worker’s claim. When an insurance company starts disputing medical care on a workers’ compensation case, it’s usually only a matter of time before they start disputing other benefits, if they haven’t already been denied.
For a free, no-obligation case evaluation to learn more about your options when the workers’ compensation insurance company is disputing your medical care, call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email.
Sunday, February 19, 2012
Facebook May Be Used to Deny Your Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Claim
Unfortunately, some workers’ compensation insurance companies will go to great lengths to come up with a reason to deny an otherwise legitimate Minnesota workers’ compensation claim. Other insurance companies thoroughly investigate each and every claim to root out fraud. In both cases, workers’ compensation insurers routinely use internet searches to see if there is relevant information on the internet regarding you or your claim.
Social media sites, especially Facebook, are getting some workers’ compensation claimants into trouble. Obviously, if a worker claims to have a back injury and that they can’t work, but has posted pictures of themselves skydiving after the alleged injury, that type of fraudulent claim should be denied.
Unfortunately, however, some workers’ compensation insurers are trying to use even seemingly innocent posts and pictures as a basis to deny an injured workers’ claim, or to dispute the extent of that worker’s injury. For example, if you have cherry, happy status updates, or post that you’re “doing well,” some workers’ compensation insurers are arguing that those types of posts are evidence that you’re not hurt as badly as you claim, or that you’re not hurt at all.
Adjusters are also using seemingly innocent pictures for the same purpose. For example, if an injured worker has a knee injury that prevents them from working, a photo of that worker sitting around a campfire having a beer with friends might be used to argue that you’re not hurt as badly as you claim.
The discoverability of Facebook content, or whether or not you’re required to turn over your Facebook content to the insurance company, is a relatively new area of the law. Generally speaking, courts in a number of jurisdictions have held that your Facebook content is discoverable in the context of a workers’ compensation case, meaning that you may be legally required to turn over the content of your Facebook account to the workers’ compensation insurer.
Within the last two years or so, I’ve now run into a number of Minnesota workers’ comp. cases where the insurer has demanded disclosure of all social networking sites my client belongs to. Thus far, I have yet to encounter a case where the insurer is demanding direct access to those social networking accounts, but I’m sure it’s simply a matter of time before we’re seeing that type of request on a regular basis.
Is this fair? Definitely not. I have a personal Facebook account, and I definitely don’t want everyone to see everything. The best way to protect yourself is to regularly check that you have your privacy settings set to the highest level, use common sense about what you post, and regularly monitor what other people are posting about you. You should assume that anything shared on a social media site is not private, and could be used against you. If you have something you’d like to keep private, keep it off the internet.
Visit us at MeuserLaw.com to learn more about your Minnesota workers’ compensation rights, call us at 877-746-5680, or click here to send us an email.
Social media sites, especially Facebook, are getting some workers’ compensation claimants into trouble. Obviously, if a worker claims to have a back injury and that they can’t work, but has posted pictures of themselves skydiving after the alleged injury, that type of fraudulent claim should be denied.
Unfortunately, however, some workers’ compensation insurers are trying to use even seemingly innocent posts and pictures as a basis to deny an injured workers’ claim, or to dispute the extent of that worker’s injury. For example, if you have cherry, happy status updates, or post that you’re “doing well,” some workers’ compensation insurers are arguing that those types of posts are evidence that you’re not hurt as badly as you claim, or that you’re not hurt at all.
Adjusters are also using seemingly innocent pictures for the same purpose. For example, if an injured worker has a knee injury that prevents them from working, a photo of that worker sitting around a campfire having a beer with friends might be used to argue that you’re not hurt as badly as you claim.
The discoverability of Facebook content, or whether or not you’re required to turn over your Facebook content to the insurance company, is a relatively new area of the law. Generally speaking, courts in a number of jurisdictions have held that your Facebook content is discoverable in the context of a workers’ compensation case, meaning that you may be legally required to turn over the content of your Facebook account to the workers’ compensation insurer.
Within the last two years or so, I’ve now run into a number of Minnesota workers’ comp. cases where the insurer has demanded disclosure of all social networking sites my client belongs to. Thus far, I have yet to encounter a case where the insurer is demanding direct access to those social networking accounts, but I’m sure it’s simply a matter of time before we’re seeing that type of request on a regular basis.
Is this fair? Definitely not. I have a personal Facebook account, and I definitely don’t want everyone to see everything. The best way to protect yourself is to regularly check that you have your privacy settings set to the highest level, use common sense about what you post, and regularly monitor what other people are posting about you. You should assume that anything shared on a social media site is not private, and could be used against you. If you have something you’d like to keep private, keep it off the internet.
Visit us at MeuserLaw.com to learn more about your Minnesota workers’ compensation rights, call us at 877-746-5680, or click here to send us an email.
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Back Pain Mistakes: MN Workers' Compensation
Back injuries are the most common type of work-related injury we see in our Minnesota workers’ compensation law practice.
Dealing with severe or chronic back pain due to a work injury can be incredibly difficult. According to Spine-Health.com, avoiding some common mistakes can help keep you from making your back pain worse.
In Minnesota, if you sustain an on-the-job back injury, you may be eligible for workers’ compensation benefits, including medical expense benefits, wage loss benefits, vocational rehabilitation benefits, and/or permanent partial disability benefits. For a free, no-obligation case consultation, call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email to speak with one of our Minnesota workers’ compensation attorneys.
Dealing with severe or chronic back pain due to a work injury can be incredibly difficult. According to Spine-Health.com, avoiding some common mistakes can help keep you from making your back pain worse.
- Ignoring your pain for too long. Often, an acute attack of low back pain will get better within a few weeks, but that doesn’t mean you should ignore it. For chronic or severe back pain, a spine specialist may be able to give you a diagnosis and treatment plan to help you manage or reduce your pain.
- Relying on your general practitioner for too long. If your back pain is severe and/or lasts for more than a few weeks, you may need to see someone with more specialized training in back pain, such as a chiropractor or spine specialist. A spine specialist may be able to give you a better diagnosis and treatment plan than a general practitioner.
- Jumping to surgery too quickly. Surgery is not necessarily a “quick fix.” In most cases, it is typically recommended that back pain patients try non-surgical, or conservative treatment, such as chiropractic care or physical therapy, for several weeks or months before seeing a spine surgeon. While surgery can correct a structural problem in the spine, such as a disc pressing a nerve, a sustained exercise and rehabilitation program can often promote long-term recovery.
- Postponing back surgery for too long. For some types of back conditions, such as those involving nerve root compression, patients often tend to do better if they have surgery sooner, rather than later.
- Focusing on MRI results. While an MRI scan can show areas of your spine that might be responsible for causing your pain, you need a full clinical diagnosis to determine an appropriate treatment plan. Often patients with severe back pain have a normal MRI scan, and individuals with significant structural abnormalities on an MRI have no back pain.
- Being inactive. Often people with back pain try to avoid aggravating their back pain or triggering pain flare-ups by limiting their physical activity. Over time, however, lack of activity often leads to more pain. Keeping your back flexible and strong improves your core support, hastens the healing process, and reduces the chances of future injury or aggravations.
In Minnesota, if you sustain an on-the-job back injury, you may be eligible for workers’ compensation benefits, including medical expense benefits, wage loss benefits, vocational rehabilitation benefits, and/or permanent partial disability benefits. For a free, no-obligation case consultation, call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email to speak with one of our Minnesota workers’ compensation attorneys.
Sunday, February 12, 2012
Construction Laborers and Work Injuries
Performing heavy labor at a construction site can lead to work injuries. Construction laborers commonly sustain injuries to their back, fingers and hands, and knees, as the result of repetitive, strenuous job activities.Some types of job activities, that when performed repetitively for prolonged periods of time, can lead to injuries, include:
- Exerting significant force to perform tasks or use tools
- Remaining in a static position for extended periods of time
- Pressure against a body part from a hard surface or edge
- Using awkward back, hand, wrist, elbow, or shoulder positions
- Working in positions such as bending, stooping, kneeling, twisting, or overhead reaching, repetitively, or for prolonged periods
- Sitting on, standing on, or holding vibrating equipment or tools
- Working in very hot or very cold temperatures
- Pain
- Stiffness
- Aching
- Fatigue
- Temperature changes in the hands or feet
- Swelling
- Numbness
- Tingling
- Changes in skin color
- Weakness
- Loss of sensation
Construction workers often run into unique issues on their workers' compensation cases, including insurance coverage issues, and third party liability issues. An experienced Minnesota workers' compensation lawyer can help you navigate the system. To learn more about your Minnesota workers’ compensation rights, contact Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email for a FREE, NO-OBLIGATION case evaluation.
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Young Workers Hurt More Frequently On the Job
If you sustain a serious work-related injury when you're young, it can affect you for the rest of your life. Young workers injured on the job should take steps to protect their future workers' compensation rights.
Recent studies show that younger people, ages 15-24, are twice as likely to suffer an on-the-job injury that requires medical care than their older counterparts. Workers between the ages of 18 and 19 have the highest non-fatal injury rate of all workers.
This increased risk of injury among young workers may be due to lack of experience, limited training, and insufficient supervision. Young workers are also less likely to speak up about job safety, to ask for help, to recognize safety hazards, or to speak up if they’re unsure about how to operate equipment or machinery. That puts them at much greater risk for suffering on-the-job injuries.
Young workers may also be hesitant to report work-related injuries for fear of losing their job, or for fear of getting in trouble. Young workers are also much less likely to be aware of what their rights are under the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Act.
How a young worker handles his or her workers’ compensation claim today can have serious consequences for his or her health, career, and well-being in the future.
All too often I speak with people who sustained significant work-related injuries years ago when they were in their late teens or early twenties. Some of those people didn’t take steps to protect their workers’ compensation rights, and as a result, they are now facing significant difficulties because of that work-related injury they had when they were younger.
A Minnesota workers’ compensation lawyer can help young workers who are injured on the job take steps today to help protect their workers’ compensation rights in the future. Call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email to schedule a free, no-obligation consultation with a Minnesota workers’ compensation lawyer.
Recent studies show that younger people, ages 15-24, are twice as likely to suffer an on-the-job injury that requires medical care than their older counterparts. Workers between the ages of 18 and 19 have the highest non-fatal injury rate of all workers.
This increased risk of injury among young workers may be due to lack of experience, limited training, and insufficient supervision. Young workers are also less likely to speak up about job safety, to ask for help, to recognize safety hazards, or to speak up if they’re unsure about how to operate equipment or machinery. That puts them at much greater risk for suffering on-the-job injuries.
Young workers may also be hesitant to report work-related injuries for fear of losing their job, or for fear of getting in trouble. Young workers are also much less likely to be aware of what their rights are under the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Act.
How a young worker handles his or her workers’ compensation claim today can have serious consequences for his or her health, career, and well-being in the future.
All too often I speak with people who sustained significant work-related injuries years ago when they were in their late teens or early twenties. Some of those people didn’t take steps to protect their workers’ compensation rights, and as a result, they are now facing significant difficulties because of that work-related injury they had when they were younger.
A Minnesota workers’ compensation lawyer can help young workers who are injured on the job take steps today to help protect their workers’ compensation rights in the future. Call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email to schedule a free, no-obligation consultation with a Minnesota workers’ compensation lawyer.
Sunday, February 5, 2012
Portable Ladder Safety: Minnesota Workers’ Compensation
Falls from ladders are a leading cause of occupational injury and death. If you sustain injuries as a result of a fall from a ladder at work, in Minnesota, you are eligible for workers’ compensation benefits, including medical benefits, wage loss benefits, permanent partial disability benefits, and rehabilitation benefits.
About 100 people die as a result of falling from a ladder each year, and ladder falls account for approximately 100 thousand injuries every year. Ladder falls most commonly involve injuries to the elbow and forearm, knee and lower leg, and the head. Fractures as a result of ladder falls most commonly involved fractures to the forearm, lower leg and ankle, and ribs, sternum and thoracic spine.
There are things you can do to avoid falls from ladders, including:
Call us at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email.
About 100 people die as a result of falling from a ladder each year, and ladder falls account for approximately 100 thousand injuries every year. Ladder falls most commonly involve injuries to the elbow and forearm, knee and lower leg, and the head. Fractures as a result of ladder falls most commonly involved fractures to the forearm, lower leg and ankle, and ribs, sternum and thoracic spine.
There are things you can do to avoid falls from ladders, including:
- Avoiding electrical hazards by looking for overhead lines before placing a ladder and avoiding metal ladders and equipment. Inspecting the ladder before use.
- Don’t use damaged ladders.
- Don’t use the top step or rung of a ladder unless it was designed for that purpose.
- Don’t use self-supporting ladders as a single ladder or in a closed position, i.e., don’t lean a closed step ladder up against the side of a house.
- Use a ladder on stable and level surfaces, or secure it at the top or bottom to avoid movement.
- Don’t place a ladder on top of boxes, barrels, or other unstable objects to obtain additional height.
- Don’t move or shift a ladder while a person or equipment is on the ladder.
- Be sure that all locks on an extension ladder are properly engaged.
Call us at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email.
Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Medical Mileage Reimbursement for MN Workers’ Compensation Injuries
One of the workers’ compensation benefits provided to injured workers in Minnesota is reimbursement for medical mileage.
This is also one of the most frequently overlooked benefits. If you don’t submit your medical mileage to the insurer for reimbursement, they aren’t going to pay it.
The current medical mileage reimbursement rate for travel for medical care or treatment for a work-related injury, on or after July 1, 2011 is 55 ½ cents per mile. If you’re traveling back and forth to multiple doctor appointments, chiropractor visits, or physical therapy, your claim for medical mileage reimbursement, your mileage reimbursement claim can really add up.
The most challenging aspect to making a claim for medical mileage reimbursement is remembering to keep track of your round trip mileage to and from your appointments, and remembering to periodically submit your mileage to the workers’ compensation insurer for reimbursement.
For a free, no-obligation consultation to learn more about your Minnesota workers’ compensation rights, contact Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email.
This is also one of the most frequently overlooked benefits. If you don’t submit your medical mileage to the insurer for reimbursement, they aren’t going to pay it.
The current medical mileage reimbursement rate for travel for medical care or treatment for a work-related injury, on or after July 1, 2011 is 55 ½ cents per mile. If you’re traveling back and forth to multiple doctor appointments, chiropractor visits, or physical therapy, your claim for medical mileage reimbursement, your mileage reimbursement claim can really add up.
The most challenging aspect to making a claim for medical mileage reimbursement is remembering to keep track of your round trip mileage to and from your appointments, and remembering to periodically submit your mileage to the workers’ compensation insurer for reimbursement.
For a free, no-obligation consultation to learn more about your Minnesota workers’ compensation rights, contact Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email.
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
I Received a PPD Payment, Is My Case Closed? Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Permanent Partial Disability
I get calls from injured workers in Minnesota a couple times a month who’ve received a check in the mail from the workers’ compensation insurance company and a Notice of Benefit Payment which indicates that they’re receiving payment for Permanent Partial Disability (PPD) benefits.
These folks often have questions about what exactly this payment is for, and how it may affect their rights.
Usually, the permanent partial disability (PPD) payment is based on a rating that your doctor assigned to your permanent injury. In some cases, insurance companies pay a minimum amount of permanent partial disability benefits if there’s a question as to whether the injured worker may be eligible for a higher rating.
Receiving a permanent partial disability (PPD) payment on a Minnesota workers’ compensation case does not mean that your case is settled or closed. Cashing your PPD payment does not mean that you’ve accepted a settlement, or agreed to close your case.
Many workers who receive a PPD payment are eligible for additional workers’ compensation benefits. When I speak with injured workers who have questions about a PPD payment they’ve received, I typically try to evaluate:
As part of investigation his claim, I obtained copies of his workers’ compensation file from the Department of Labor and Industry. While I found documentation that this gentleman had been paid permanent partial disability benefits for some of his back injuries, I couldn’t locate any documentation of any settlements. The attorneys for the insurance companies involved were also unable to locate any documentation of any settlements. I realized that this gentlemen ASSUMED that he had settled his cases because he had received permanent partial disability payments for his injuries.
In fact, because he hadn’t settled his cases, this gentleman has a substantial claim for wage loss benefits, in addition to his claims for payment of his medical expenses.
The moral of the story is that a permanent partial disability (PPD) payment on a Minnesota workers’ compensation case is not a settlement or a close out of other claims.
If you’ve received a permanent partial disability (PPD) payment on your Minnesota workers’ compensation case, a workers’ compensation attorney can evaluate whether the payment is appropriate and whether or not you have additional workers’ compensation claims. For a free, no-obligation Minnesota workers’ compensation case consultation, call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email.
Usually, the permanent partial disability (PPD) payment is based on a rating that your doctor assigned to your permanent injury. In some cases, insurance companies pay a minimum amount of permanent partial disability benefits if there’s a question as to whether the injured worker may be eligible for a higher rating.
Receiving a permanent partial disability (PPD) payment on a Minnesota workers’ compensation case does not mean that your case is settled or closed. Cashing your PPD payment does not mean that you’ve accepted a settlement, or agreed to close your case.
Many workers who receive a PPD payment are eligible for additional workers’ compensation benefits. When I speak with injured workers who have questions about a PPD payment they’ve received, I typically try to evaluate:
- Whether the amount of PPD is correct.
- Whether a maximum medical improvement (MMI) determination is premature.
- And, whether they may be eligible for additional workers’ compensation benefits.
As part of investigation his claim, I obtained copies of his workers’ compensation file from the Department of Labor and Industry. While I found documentation that this gentleman had been paid permanent partial disability benefits for some of his back injuries, I couldn’t locate any documentation of any settlements. The attorneys for the insurance companies involved were also unable to locate any documentation of any settlements. I realized that this gentlemen ASSUMED that he had settled his cases because he had received permanent partial disability payments for his injuries.
In fact, because he hadn’t settled his cases, this gentleman has a substantial claim for wage loss benefits, in addition to his claims for payment of his medical expenses.
The moral of the story is that a permanent partial disability (PPD) payment on a Minnesota workers’ compensation case is not a settlement or a close out of other claims.
If you’ve received a permanent partial disability (PPD) payment on your Minnesota workers’ compensation case, a workers’ compensation attorney can evaluate whether the payment is appropriate and whether or not you have additional workers’ compensation claims. For a free, no-obligation Minnesota workers’ compensation case consultation, call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email.
Monday, January 30, 2012
Do I Need A Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Lawyer?
In an ideal world, all Minnesota workers who are hurt at work would automatically get all the benefits they are entitled to under the law. Unfortunately, in most Minnesota workers’ compensation cases, it’s not a matter of IF the workers’ compensation insurer will dispute your claim – it’s a matter of when.
Meuser & Associate represents injured workers thorough the State of Minnesota for a variety of on-the-job injuries, including neck injuries, back injuries, carpal tunnel syndrome, traumatic brain injuries, shoulder injuries, crush injuries, spinal cord injuries, ankle injuries, burns, and catastrophic injuries.
If the workers’ compensation insurance company is paying on my claim, why do I need a Minnesota workers’ compensation lawyer?
Even injured workers who are currently receiving workers’ compensation benefits are well advised to take advantage of a free, no-obligation consultation with a Minnesota workers’ compensation attorney.
As a rule, once you’ve sustained a work-related injury, you are a liability for your employer and their workers’ compensation insurance company. At all stages of your case, the insurance company is looking for ways to minimize the cost of your claim. Even on admitted workers’ compensation claims in Minnesota, where the insurance company has acknowledged responsibility for payment of benefits, there are dozens of ways they can seek to cut you off, undermine your rights, and minimize your entitlement to claims.
For example, workers’ compensation insurance companies often:
- Contest everything about your case, including the reasonableness and necessity of your medical care, your entitlement to wage loss benefits, or even whether or not you were actually hurt at work.
- If given the opportunity, refer you to a short list of doctors who will minimize the seriousness of your injuries, provide minimal medical care, or push you to return to unrestricted work too soon.
- Delay or deny your access to treatment with a specialist, diagnostic testing, or surgery.
- Cut off your wage loss benefits in the hopes that the delay in your receipt of monetary benefits will “starve you out” and force you to accept a settlement for pennies on the dollar.
- Underpay on wage loss benefits or permanent partial disability benefits, either intentionally or unintentionally.
- Neglect to tell you about your right to rehabilitation benefits, or permanent partial disability benefits.
- Wait for you to make a mistake on your claim that will give them a basis to cut you off.
If you’ve suffered a serious work-related injury, everything you’ve worked for can be at risk, including your financial security, your career, and most importantly, your health. A good Minnesota workers’ compensation lawyer can help you navigate the process and help you protect your rights.
An injured worker should never rely on the workers’ compensation insurance company to protect his or her best interests. Being informed about your Minnesota workers’ compensation rights is your first step to protecting your interests. For a free, no-obligation workers’ compensation consultation to learn more about your rights, call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email.
Sunday, January 29, 2012
Treatment for Burn Injuries
Severe burn injuries caused by car accidents or workplace accidents, often require hospitalization. Burn injuries are treated with a variety of types of treatment. For example, treatment may include:
If you suffered burn injuries as the result of a workplace accident, you may be eligible for Minnesota workers’ compensation benefits, including medical expense benefits, wage loss benefits, permanent partial disability benefits, and rehabilitation benefits.
If you’ve suffered a burn injury as the result of a car accident or workplace injury, a Minnesota personal injury lawyer or workers’ compensation lawyer can help you through the process of making sure you get the benefits you’re entitled to. For a free, no-obligation consultation, contact Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email.
- Topical treatments with antibiotics. Patients with severe burn injuries are susceptible to viral and bacterial infections. Topical antibiotic medications may be applied to the skin to speed the healing process, to minimize scarring, and to prevent infection.
- Bandages. Serious burns typically need to be bandaged to prevent infection, and to allow the wound to remain clear of fluids and pus. Bandages also help reduce pain and keep the skin and body part immobilized during healing.
- Pressure garments. Pressure garments are often worn on a burned area during the healing process to help prevent excessive scarring.
- Elevating burned areas. Elevation helps minimize swelling of the affected limb. In severe burns, fluid often accumulates in the wounded area, causing swelling. Swelling can complicate a burn injury because the affected area can develop high levels of pressure and blood flow problems.
- Surgical cuts or escharectomies. This procedure helps reduce excess pressure under the skin in a burned limb.
- Skin grafts. This procedure involves transplanting a piece of skin from one area of the body to another.
- Synthetic skin grafts. If a large portion of a victim’s skin is burned, synthetic skin may be used instead of the victim’s own skin.
- Physical therapy. During healing, scar tissue is formed. To help keep the newly formed skin flexible for normal movement, burn victims may participate in rehabilitation and physical therapy. If the burn extends through the skin into the muscle tissue, more intensive physical therapy may assist in a patient’s recovery.
- Dermabrasion. This is a surgical procedure to improve or minimize the appearance of scars, restore function and correct disfigurements as a result of a burn.
If you suffered burn injuries as the result of a workplace accident, you may be eligible for Minnesota workers’ compensation benefits, including medical expense benefits, wage loss benefits, permanent partial disability benefits, and rehabilitation benefits.
If you’ve suffered a burn injury as the result of a car accident or workplace injury, a Minnesota personal injury lawyer or workers’ compensation lawyer can help you through the process of making sure you get the benefits you’re entitled to. For a free, no-obligation consultation, contact Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email.
Saturday, January 28, 2012
Preventing Work-Related Back Injuries
Back injuries are the most common work-related injuries we see in our Minnesota workers’ compensation law practice. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, back injuries account for 1 in 5 workplace injuries/illnesses. Back injuries are painful and debilitating. After you’ve sustained a back injury, you’re more likely to suffer a re-occurrence or re-injury of your back in the future.
Risk factors for back injuries include:
Risk factors for back injuries include:
- Improper lifting or lifting objects that are too heavy.
- Repetitive motions that lead to muscle fatigue and injury or gradual wear and tear.
- Poor posture while sitting, standing, or performing job activities.
- Stress, which can lead to muscle tension and back pain.
- Age-related wear and tear.
- Excess weight, which puts extra strain on the back.
- Presence of other diseases, such as arthritis or degenerative disc disease.
- Cigarette smoking which increases the risk of low back pain and slows healing of injuries.
- Learning and using safe lifting techniques.
- Using mechanical lifting aids when possible.
- Improving posture while sitting, standing, or performing work activities.
- Using ergonomically-appropriate chairs, equipment, and materials to avoid awkward postures and reaching.
- Changing positions frequently.
- Taking mini-breaks, especially while performing repetitive tasks.
- Minimizing bending and reaching.
- Managing and reducing stress.
- Maintaining a healthy weight.
- Improving overall wellness by eating well, sleeping enough, and getting regular exercise.
- Adopting an exercise routine focusing on strengthening the back and abdominal muscles.
Friday, January 27, 2012
Does MN PERA Cover PTSD and Other Psychological Conditions?
I spoke with a Minnesota police officer recently who asked me whether or not Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was covered for Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) Police and Fire Plan Duty Disability Benefits.
I explained that, yes, psychological conditions are specifically enumerated under the PERA Duty Disability statute, meaning that they are specifically covered. This police officer had been involved in some extremely high-stress incidents in the last few years, and had started to exhibit symptoms consistent with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). His doctors are telling him that he can no longer work in law enforcement due to his condition. He was obviously concerned about what his options were in the event that he could not continue working as a police officer.
Interestingly, before calling me, he had talked to “some people” who told him that psychological conditions weren’t covered by PERA. First off, I’m glad he called. If he had relied on what “some people” told him, he wouldn’t be aware that he’s eligible for 60% of his high-five salary, tax free, through age 55, plus continued health insurance through his employer. These benefits are potentially worth hundreds of thousands of dollars to him.
Police officers and firefighters in Minnesota who are covered under the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) Police and Fire Plan are eligible for disability benefits in the event that they are unable to perform their normal duties. There are two basic types of disability benefits under the PERA Police and Fire Plan: Duty and Regular.
Duty disability benefits. Duty disability pays at a basic rate of 60% of police officer or firefighter’s average high-five. Qualification for duty disability also entitles a police officer or firefighter to continued health insurance under Minn. Stat. § 299A.465.
PERA duty disability is defined as follows:
PERA regular disability is defined as follows:
If you’re a Minnesota police officer who is suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder as a result of experiencing traumatic incidents in the line of duty, and you cannot return to work in law enforcement due to your condition, you may be eligible for PERA duty disability benefits.
Don’t rely on “some people” to give you legal advice about your rights to hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of benefits PERA disability benefits. Speak with a PERA lawyer about your rights. There’s simply too much at stake to risk trying to figure it out on your own, or to risk depending on the advice of “some people.”
Meuser & Associate has represented dozens of police officers and firefighters throughout the State of Minnesota in conjunction with claims for PERA disability benefits. We’ve also successfully secured PERA duty disability benefits on behalf of a number of police officers suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) as a result of in-the-line of duty psychological trauma. For a free, no-obligation legal consultation to learn about your rights, call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email to schedule an appointment with Jen or Ron.
I explained that, yes, psychological conditions are specifically enumerated under the PERA Duty Disability statute, meaning that they are specifically covered. This police officer had been involved in some extremely high-stress incidents in the last few years, and had started to exhibit symptoms consistent with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). His doctors are telling him that he can no longer work in law enforcement due to his condition. He was obviously concerned about what his options were in the event that he could not continue working as a police officer.
Interestingly, before calling me, he had talked to “some people” who told him that psychological conditions weren’t covered by PERA. First off, I’m glad he called. If he had relied on what “some people” told him, he wouldn’t be aware that he’s eligible for 60% of his high-five salary, tax free, through age 55, plus continued health insurance through his employer. These benefits are potentially worth hundreds of thousands of dollars to him.
Police officers and firefighters in Minnesota who are covered under the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) Police and Fire Plan are eligible for disability benefits in the event that they are unable to perform their normal duties. There are two basic types of disability benefits under the PERA Police and Fire Plan: Duty and Regular.
Duty disability benefits. Duty disability pays at a basic rate of 60% of police officer or firefighter’s average high-five. Qualification for duty disability also entitles a police officer or firefighter to continued health insurance under Minn. Stat. § 299A.465.
PERA duty disability is defined as follows:
"Duty disability," physical or psychological, means a condition that is expected to prevent a member, for a period of not less than 12 months, from performing the normal duties of the position held by a person who is a member of the public employees police and fire plan, and that is the direct result of an injury incurred during, or a disease arising out of, the performance of normal duties or the actual performance of less frequent duties, either of which are specific to protecting the property and personal safety of others and that present inherent dangers that are specific to the positions covered by the public employees police and fire plan.Regular disability benefits. Regular disability is paid at a base rate of 45% of a police officer or firefighter’s high-five salary. Individuals who qualify for regular disability are not eligible for health care continuation under Minn. Stat. § 299A.465.
PERA regular disability is defined as follows:
"Regular disability," physical or psychological, means a condition that is expected to prevent a member, for a period of not less than 12 months, from performing the normal duties of the position held by a person who is a member of the public employees police and fire plan, and which results from a disease or an injury that arises from any activities while not at work, or while at work and performing those normal or less frequent duties that do not present inherent dangers that are specific to the occupations covered by the public employees police and fire plan.Unfortunately, police officers have a high incidence of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) as the result of experiencing disturbing, dangerous, and traumatic situations. Due in large part to increased awareness about the psychological effects of dealing with traumatic and stressful situations, more and more Minnesota police officers are seeking treatment for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.
If you’re a Minnesota police officer who is suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder as a result of experiencing traumatic incidents in the line of duty, and you cannot return to work in law enforcement due to your condition, you may be eligible for PERA duty disability benefits.
Don’t rely on “some people” to give you legal advice about your rights to hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of benefits PERA disability benefits. Speak with a PERA lawyer about your rights. There’s simply too much at stake to risk trying to figure it out on your own, or to risk depending on the advice of “some people.”
Meuser & Associate has represented dozens of police officers and firefighters throughout the State of Minnesota in conjunction with claims for PERA disability benefits. We’ve also successfully secured PERA duty disability benefits on behalf of a number of police officers suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) as a result of in-the-line of duty psychological trauma. For a free, no-obligation legal consultation to learn about your rights, call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email to schedule an appointment with Jen or Ron.
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Choose Your Own QRC: MN Work Comp. Qualified Rehabilitation Consultants
In Minnesota, if you are having difficulty performing your job duties because of your work injury, or if your employer has terminated you or laid you off because there is no work within your restrictions, you may be eligible for the assistance of a Qualified Rehabilitation Consultant (QRC).If you are injured on the job, you have the right to request a consultation with a QRC at any time. After your consultation, the QRC will determine if you are a “qualified employee,” which means
"an employee who, because of the effects of a work-related injury or disease, whether or not combined with the effects of a prior injury or disability:
A. is permanently precluded or is likely to be permanently precluded from engaging in the employee's usual and customary occupation or from engaging in the job the employee held at the time of injury;
B. cannot reasonably be expected to return to suitable gainful employment with the date-of injury employer; and
C. can reasonably be expected to return to suitable gainful employment through the provision of rehabilitation services, considering the treating physician's opinion of the employee's work ability."
If you are found to be a qualified employee, your QRC works with you, your employer, your medical providers, and the workers’ compensation insurance company to help you get back to suitable gainful employment.
QRC’s also provide medical management services, transferable skills analysis, vocational testing, ergonomic job modification, job seeking skills training, resume preparation, and job development and placement.
You have the right to choose your own QRC! The QRC you choose can have a significant impact on your case.
Qualified Rehabilitation Consultants are licensed in the state of Minnesota to provide vocational rehabilitation services to injured workers. While QRC’s are supposed to work in the interests of both the employee and the employer, some QRC’s are not exactly “independent.”
If an insurance company assigns you a QRC, there’s a good possibility that if push comes to shove, your insurance-company-assigned QRC is not going to be looking out for your interests. Even if you’ve met with a QRC the insurance company assigned to you, and you’ve signed a Rehabilitation Plan (R-2) in Minnesota, you have the right to change QRC’s within 60 days without having to seek approval from the workers’ compensation insurance company.
If you feel like your QRC is minimizing your injuries, if you feel like your QRC is pushing your doctor to return you to work too early, or if you feel like your QRC is pressuring your doctor to decrease or remove your restrictions, you may want to consider changing QRC’s.
After 60 days have passed, it gets more difficult to change QRC’s. After that point, you must have pre-approval from your workers’ compensation insurer, or you must get a decision from the Department of Labor and Industry or a Workers’ Compensation Judge in order to switch. You must show that a change in QRC’s is in the best interests of both parties.
If you’ve been contacted by a QRC that’s been assigned to you by your employer or their insurance company, it’s a good idea to speak with a Minnesota workers’ compensation lawyer before agreeing to that QRC. For a free, no-obligation workers’ compensation case consultation, call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email.
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
More TTD Means TPD More Likely: MN Workers’ Comp. Wage Loss
According to an analysis done by the MN Department of Labor and Industry, workers who receive Temporary Total Disability (TTD) benefits for an extended period are more likely to be eligible for Temporary Partial Disability (TPD) benefits once they return to work.
Temporary Total Disability (TTD) benefits are available to injured workers if they are completely restricted from working, or if they are unable to return to their date-of-injury employer as a result of their injuries, and they are conducting a diligent job search. These benefits are currently available for a maximum of 130 weeks at a rate of 2/3 of the workers’ average weekly wage (AWW) at the time of the injury, capped at a maximum of $850.00 per week. If the employee has reached maximum medical improvement (MMI), entitlement to TTD ceases 90 days after reaching MMI.
Temporary Partial Disability (TPD) benefits are available to injured workers who are able to return to work at a reduced wage due to their work-related injury or illness. TPD benefits are available for a maximum of 225 weeks, but for no more than 450 weeks after the date of injury. TPD benefits are paid at a rate of 2/3 of the difference between the workers’ average weekly wage (AWW) and their reduced earnings.
The Department of Labor and Industry determined that the overall percentage of injured workers with wage loss benefits who receive TPD benefits has stayed at about 29 percent. For injuries between 2003 and 2008, the percentage of indemnity claims with TPD benefits increases with the duration of TTD benefits, leveling off at about 55 percent for claims with more than six month of TTD benefits.
In plain language, what this means it that the longer an injured worker receives temporary total disability (TTD) benefits, the more likely it is that he or she will be eligible for temporary partial disability (TPD) benefits.
In our Minnesota workers' compensation practice, we see many claims where an injured worker with permanent restrictions returned to work, possibly with minimal or no wage loss, and then subsequently lost that job, or had to take a lower paying job due to his or her injuries. In many of these cases, the injured worker was never told they were eligible for additional TPD benefits.
For a free, no-obligation workers' compensation case evaluation, contact Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680, or click here to send us an email to schedule an appointment with one of our attorneys.
Temporary Total Disability (TTD) benefits are available to injured workers if they are completely restricted from working, or if they are unable to return to their date-of-injury employer as a result of their injuries, and they are conducting a diligent job search. These benefits are currently available for a maximum of 130 weeks at a rate of 2/3 of the workers’ average weekly wage (AWW) at the time of the injury, capped at a maximum of $850.00 per week. If the employee has reached maximum medical improvement (MMI), entitlement to TTD ceases 90 days after reaching MMI.
Temporary Partial Disability (TPD) benefits are available to injured workers who are able to return to work at a reduced wage due to their work-related injury or illness. TPD benefits are available for a maximum of 225 weeks, but for no more than 450 weeks after the date of injury. TPD benefits are paid at a rate of 2/3 of the difference between the workers’ average weekly wage (AWW) and their reduced earnings.
The Department of Labor and Industry determined that the overall percentage of injured workers with wage loss benefits who receive TPD benefits has stayed at about 29 percent. For injuries between 2003 and 2008, the percentage of indemnity claims with TPD benefits increases with the duration of TTD benefits, leveling off at about 55 percent for claims with more than six month of TTD benefits.
In plain language, what this means it that the longer an injured worker receives temporary total disability (TTD) benefits, the more likely it is that he or she will be eligible for temporary partial disability (TPD) benefits.
In our Minnesota workers' compensation practice, we see many claims where an injured worker with permanent restrictions returned to work, possibly with minimal or no wage loss, and then subsequently lost that job, or had to take a lower paying job due to his or her injuries. In many of these cases, the injured worker was never told they were eligible for additional TPD benefits.
For a free, no-obligation workers' compensation case evaluation, contact Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680, or click here to send us an email to schedule an appointment with one of our attorneys.
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Causes of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and MN Workers' Comp.
Carpal tunnel syndrome is one of the most common work-related injuries we see in our Minnesota workers’ compensation law practice. Carpal tunnel syndrome is not only painful, but it can interfere with your ability to do your job.
If your work activities substantially contributed to your development of carpal tunnel syndrome, you may be eligible for Minnesota workers’ compensation benefits, including medical expense benefits, wage loss benefits, permanent partial disability benefits, and rehabilitation benefits.
In Minnesota, when carpal tunnel syndrome is caused by a worker’s day-to-day activities, or where it develops over time as a result of an employee’s work, it is known as a repetitive motion injury, or a Gillette-type injury.
Unfortunately, workers’ compensation cases involving carpal tunnel syndrome are also very commonly disputed by workers’ compensation insurance companies. Rather than acknowledging that your work activities contributed to the development of your condition, the workers’ compensation insurance company will usually try to point to some other cause, such as obesity, diabetes, or no cause at all.
In fact I’ve seen a number of independent medical examiners simply conclude that females over the age of 40 are more likely to develop carpal tunnel syndrome, and that therefore, the workers’ job activities are not a substantial contributing factor to her carpal tunnel syndrome.
Carpal tunnel syndrome occurs when there is pressure on the median nerve as it passes through the carpal tunnel in your wrist. This pressure causes sensations of tingling, numbness, pain, and/or weakness in parts of your hand.
Things that can contribute to the development of carpal tunnel syndrome include:
If your work activities substantially contributed to your development of carpal tunnel syndrome, you may be eligible for Minnesota workers’ compensation benefits, including medical expense benefits, wage loss benefits, permanent partial disability benefits, and rehabilitation benefits.
In Minnesota, when carpal tunnel syndrome is caused by a worker’s day-to-day activities, or where it develops over time as a result of an employee’s work, it is known as a repetitive motion injury, or a Gillette-type injury.
Unfortunately, workers’ compensation cases involving carpal tunnel syndrome are also very commonly disputed by workers’ compensation insurance companies. Rather than acknowledging that your work activities contributed to the development of your condition, the workers’ compensation insurance company will usually try to point to some other cause, such as obesity, diabetes, or no cause at all.
In fact I’ve seen a number of independent medical examiners simply conclude that females over the age of 40 are more likely to develop carpal tunnel syndrome, and that therefore, the workers’ job activities are not a substantial contributing factor to her carpal tunnel syndrome.
Carpal tunnel syndrome occurs when there is pressure on the median nerve as it passes through the carpal tunnel in your wrist. This pressure causes sensations of tingling, numbness, pain, and/or weakness in parts of your hand.
Things that can contribute to the development of carpal tunnel syndrome include:
- Repetitive or forceful hand and wrist movements that cause the membranes surrounding the tendons to swell putting pressure on the median nerve.
- Work that requires awkward positioning of the hands or wrists for long periods can also put pressure on the median nerve or cause swelling of the tendons.
- Work activities that cause hand-arm vibration for long periods can contribute to carpal tunnel syndrome.
- Broken wrist bones, dislocated bones, new bone growth or bone spurs can put pressure on the median nerve.
- Conditions or illnesses that cause swelling in the joints and soft tissues, or restricted blood flow to the hands, such as obesity, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, diabetes, lupus, or hypothyroidism can result in pressure on the median nerve.
- Buildup of fluid, or edema, in the carpal tunnel, caused by pregnancy or conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis or diabetes, can put extra pressure on the median nerve.
- Smoking may contribute to carpal tunnel syndrome by affecting blood flow to the median nerve.
Monday, January 23, 2012
Pre-Existing Conditions and MN Workers’ Compensation
In Minnesota, if you re-injure or aggravate a pre-existing condition, it is covered by workers’ compensation. A person’s work activities or work injury need only be a substantial contributing factor to his or her current condition for it to be compensable under Minnesota workers’ compensation law.
While an employer is not obligated to cover a worker’s personal health, that employer take employees as they find them with whatever health conditions they bring to the job. Employers in Minnesota assume the risk that an employee’s non-work related pre-existing condition may be aggravated by a work injury or work activity.
In Minnesota, in order to be compensable workers’ compensation claim, it is not necessary that a work injury or an employees work activities be the only cause of the condition for which workers’ compensation benefits are sought. The work activities or the work injury need only be a substantial contributing factor to the cause aggravation or acceleration of a pre-existing condition.
In Vanda v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 27 W.C.D. 379, 218 N.W.2d 458 (1974), the Court explained that:
Denials and disputes based on an actual or alleged pre-existing condition are some of the most common disputes we see in our Minnesota workers’ compensation law practice. For most workers hurt on the job, if there is any suggestion or evidence of a pre-existing condition, there is a strong probability that the workers’ compensation insurance company will deny or dispute the workers’ compensation claim. We fight these issues on a regular basis, and we win these fights on a regular basis. The key is having solid medical evidence evaluating the factors listed above.
I’ve seen workers’ compensation insurers deny a back injury claim based on the fact that the worker had a minor back injury 20 years ago. I’ve seen IME doctors characterize a disc herniation as “degenerative” and argue that it pre-dated the injury, even if the worker never had any back pain or medical care prior to the injury. I’ve seen a workers’ compensation back injury claim disputed because the worker had gone to a chiropractor a few times a couple years prior to the injury. I’ve seen a knee injury claim denied because an MRI revealed evidence of degenerative changes in addition to the claimed injury. Just because the insurance company says your injury is not covered, does not mean they’re right!
In Minnesota workers’ compensation cases involving an actual or an alleged pre-existing condition, disputes with the workers’ compensation insurance company are almost inevitable. For a free, no-obligation Minnesota workers’ compensation case evaluation, call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email.
While an employer is not obligated to cover a worker’s personal health, that employer take employees as they find them with whatever health conditions they bring to the job. Employers in Minnesota assume the risk that an employee’s non-work related pre-existing condition may be aggravated by a work injury or work activity.
In Minnesota, in order to be compensable workers’ compensation claim, it is not necessary that a work injury or an employees work activities be the only cause of the condition for which workers’ compensation benefits are sought. The work activities or the work injury need only be a substantial contributing factor to the cause aggravation or acceleration of a pre-existing condition.
In Vanda v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 27 W.C.D. 379, 218 N.W.2d 458 (1974), the Court explained that:
"[W]hen the usual tasks ordinary to an employee’s work substantially aggravate, accelerate, or combine with a pre-existing disease or latent condition to produce a disability, the entire disability is compensable, no apportionment being made on the basis of relative causal contribution of the pre-existing condition and the work activities."A judge will consider several factors in determining whether an aggravation of a pre-existing condition is temporary or permanent, including (1) the nature and severity of the pre-existing condition and the extent of restrictions and disability resulting therefrom; (2) the nature of the symptoms and extent of medical treatment prior to the aggravating incident; (3) the nature and severity of the aggravating incident and the extent of the restrictions and disability resulting therefrom; (4) the nature of the symptoms and extent of medical treatment following the aggravating incident; (5) the nature and extent of the employee’s work duties and non-work activities during the relevant period; and (6) medical opinions on the issue.
Denials and disputes based on an actual or alleged pre-existing condition are some of the most common disputes we see in our Minnesota workers’ compensation law practice. For most workers hurt on the job, if there is any suggestion or evidence of a pre-existing condition, there is a strong probability that the workers’ compensation insurance company will deny or dispute the workers’ compensation claim. We fight these issues on a regular basis, and we win these fights on a regular basis. The key is having solid medical evidence evaluating the factors listed above.
I’ve seen workers’ compensation insurers deny a back injury claim based on the fact that the worker had a minor back injury 20 years ago. I’ve seen IME doctors characterize a disc herniation as “degenerative” and argue that it pre-dated the injury, even if the worker never had any back pain or medical care prior to the injury. I’ve seen a workers’ compensation back injury claim disputed because the worker had gone to a chiropractor a few times a couple years prior to the injury. I’ve seen a knee injury claim denied because an MRI revealed evidence of degenerative changes in addition to the claimed injury. Just because the insurance company says your injury is not covered, does not mean they’re right!
In Minnesota workers’ compensation cases involving an actual or an alleged pre-existing condition, disputes with the workers’ compensation insurance company are almost inevitable. For a free, no-obligation Minnesota workers’ compensation case evaluation, call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email.
Sunday, January 22, 2012
The Aging Workforce and Minnesota Workers’ Compensation
It is projected that in 2012, 19.1% of the workforce will be 55 years old and older, and will include more than 21 million workers. Many older workers are working longer and delaying retirement because they enjoy their jobs, and want to continue working. In these tough economic times, however, many older workers are forced to keep working due to their financial circumstances.
While studies show that older workers incur fewer on the job injuries than younger employees, older workers generally suffer more severe work injuries. This is due, in part, because older workers typically have decreased physical abilities than younger workers, they tend to have more degenerative-type injuries or conditions, and they typically take longer to heal than younger workers.
Older workers tend to be at greater risk for knee problems, rotator cuff conditions, and carpal tunnel syndrome, as well as degenerative conditions of the neck and back. Workplace risk factors increase the likelihood of these types of injuries, including work positions that require kneeling and squatting, work positions requiring lifting over the shoulders, job duties requiring heavy lifting, work equipment that requires awkward positioning of body parts, and job duties that require bending for prolonged periods.
Older workers often face additional legal battles over their Minnesota workers’ compensation claims. Specifically, older worker claims are more frequently denied on the basis that their condition is pre-existing. Older workers are also frequently denied wage loss benefits based on the argument that the worker “retired.”
Some types of injuries and conditions tend to develop over a long period of time, as a result of gradual wear and tear. These types of conditions are often described as “degenerative.” Injuries that develop over a long period of time, which are substantially caused by an individual’s work activities are generally referred to as repetitive motion injuries or Gillette-type injures. Even where a worker has an underlying condition that is not work-related, if that condition is aggravated or accelerated by that individual’s work activities, it is still an injury that is covered by workers’ compensation. Unfortunately, workers’ compensation insurance companies very commonly deny these claims on the grounds that the condition is pre-existing. Just because the insurance company says your condition is pre-existing doesn’t mean they’re right!
Even where an older worker has sustained an injury, and the workers’ compensation insurance company has accepted responsibility for the injury, the insurer often refuses to pay wage loss benefits if the worker cannot return to work. The workers’ compensation insurer often argues that the worker “retired,” and withdrew from the labor market, and that they are not responsible for wage loss benefits. This is particularly common in cases where the worker is close to retirement age, or if the worker accepts a pension or retirement package from the employer. More often than not, however, that injured worker would have kept working had they not been hurt on the job. In that case, usually the injured worker will be eligible for wage loss benefits. Just because the insurance company says you retired, doesn’t mean they’re right!
If you’ve sustained a work injury, and you’re over the age of 55, you may face additional difficulties in securing all of the Minnesota workers’ compensation benefits you’re entitled to. Learn about your rights! For a free, no-obligation case consultation, call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email to schedule a time to speak with one of our Minnesota workers’ compensation lawyers.
While studies show that older workers incur fewer on the job injuries than younger employees, older workers generally suffer more severe work injuries. This is due, in part, because older workers typically have decreased physical abilities than younger workers, they tend to have more degenerative-type injuries or conditions, and they typically take longer to heal than younger workers.
Older workers tend to be at greater risk for knee problems, rotator cuff conditions, and carpal tunnel syndrome, as well as degenerative conditions of the neck and back. Workplace risk factors increase the likelihood of these types of injuries, including work positions that require kneeling and squatting, work positions requiring lifting over the shoulders, job duties requiring heavy lifting, work equipment that requires awkward positioning of body parts, and job duties that require bending for prolonged periods.
Older workers often face additional legal battles over their Minnesota workers’ compensation claims. Specifically, older worker claims are more frequently denied on the basis that their condition is pre-existing. Older workers are also frequently denied wage loss benefits based on the argument that the worker “retired.”
Some types of injuries and conditions tend to develop over a long period of time, as a result of gradual wear and tear. These types of conditions are often described as “degenerative.” Injuries that develop over a long period of time, which are substantially caused by an individual’s work activities are generally referred to as repetitive motion injuries or Gillette-type injures. Even where a worker has an underlying condition that is not work-related, if that condition is aggravated or accelerated by that individual’s work activities, it is still an injury that is covered by workers’ compensation. Unfortunately, workers’ compensation insurance companies very commonly deny these claims on the grounds that the condition is pre-existing. Just because the insurance company says your condition is pre-existing doesn’t mean they’re right!
Even where an older worker has sustained an injury, and the workers’ compensation insurance company has accepted responsibility for the injury, the insurer often refuses to pay wage loss benefits if the worker cannot return to work. The workers’ compensation insurer often argues that the worker “retired,” and withdrew from the labor market, and that they are not responsible for wage loss benefits. This is particularly common in cases where the worker is close to retirement age, or if the worker accepts a pension or retirement package from the employer. More often than not, however, that injured worker would have kept working had they not been hurt on the job. In that case, usually the injured worker will be eligible for wage loss benefits. Just because the insurance company says you retired, doesn’t mean they’re right!
If you’ve sustained a work injury, and you’re over the age of 55, you may face additional difficulties in securing all of the Minnesota workers’ compensation benefits you’re entitled to. Learn about your rights! For a free, no-obligation case consultation, call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email to schedule a time to speak with one of our Minnesota workers’ compensation lawyers.
Saturday, January 21, 2012
Cold Weather Work Safety
Up until recently, winter has been unseasonably warm here in Minnesota (not that I’m complaining). That being said, temperatures have now been in the low teens, and we’re in for even colder weather.
We Minnesotans think of ourselves as a hardy breed of people who are able to tolerate the cold, but even the hardiest among us still need to take measures to stay warm and safe during cold winter weather. Minnesota workers who have to work outside in these temperatures should be mindful of the hazards of cold weather work, and they should be aware of ways to keep themselves safe and healthy when working outdoors.
Cold stress can occur when the body is unable to warm itself, and it can lead to tissue damage and possibly even death. Factors that contribute to cold stress include: 1) cold air temperatures, 2) high velocity air movement, 3) dampness of the air, and 4) contact with cold water or surfaces. A cold environment forces the body to work harder to maintain its temperature. Below-freezing temperatures can cause cold stress, but even higher temperatures, combined with wind or moisture, can cause cold stress. The most common injuries and illnesses that occur due to cold stress are hypothermia, frostbite, and trench foot.
Hypothermia
Hypothermia occurs when body heat is lost faster than it can be replaced. Symptoms begin with shivering and feet stomping in an attempt to generate heat. Workers may begin to lose coordination, experience slurred speech, and fumble with hand tools. Skin becomes cold and pale. As body temperature drops, symptoms will worsen and shivering stops. If body temperature drops below 85°F, severe hypothermia will develop, and the person may lose consciousness. At 78°F, death can occur. Medical treatment depends on the severity of the hypothermia.
Frostbite
Frostbite occurs when the skin freezes and loses water. Frostbite usually affects the extremities, including fingers, toes, and hands and feet. Exposed areas of the face can also be affected. The affected body part will be cold, tingling, stinging, or aching, followed by numbness. The skin turns red in color, then purple, then white, and is cold to the touch. In severe cases, blisters may develop. Amputation may be required in cases of severe frostbite.
Trench Foot
Trench foot, also known as immersion foot, is caused when feet are immersed in cold water at cold temperatures for long periods of time. It is similar to frostbite, but usually less severe. Symptoms include tingling, itching or burning.
Minnesota workers exposed to cold weather should take the following precautions to avoid illness or injury:
If you’ve sustained an on-the-job cold injury in Minnesota, you may be eligible for workers’ compensation benefits. For a free, no-obligation workers’ compensation case consultation, call at Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email.
We Minnesotans think of ourselves as a hardy breed of people who are able to tolerate the cold, but even the hardiest among us still need to take measures to stay warm and safe during cold winter weather. Minnesota workers who have to work outside in these temperatures should be mindful of the hazards of cold weather work, and they should be aware of ways to keep themselves safe and healthy when working outdoors.
Cold stress can occur when the body is unable to warm itself, and it can lead to tissue damage and possibly even death. Factors that contribute to cold stress include: 1) cold air temperatures, 2) high velocity air movement, 3) dampness of the air, and 4) contact with cold water or surfaces. A cold environment forces the body to work harder to maintain its temperature. Below-freezing temperatures can cause cold stress, but even higher temperatures, combined with wind or moisture, can cause cold stress. The most common injuries and illnesses that occur due to cold stress are hypothermia, frostbite, and trench foot.
Hypothermia
Hypothermia occurs when body heat is lost faster than it can be replaced. Symptoms begin with shivering and feet stomping in an attempt to generate heat. Workers may begin to lose coordination, experience slurred speech, and fumble with hand tools. Skin becomes cold and pale. As body temperature drops, symptoms will worsen and shivering stops. If body temperature drops below 85°F, severe hypothermia will develop, and the person may lose consciousness. At 78°F, death can occur. Medical treatment depends on the severity of the hypothermia.
Frostbite
Frostbite occurs when the skin freezes and loses water. Frostbite usually affects the extremities, including fingers, toes, and hands and feet. Exposed areas of the face can also be affected. The affected body part will be cold, tingling, stinging, or aching, followed by numbness. The skin turns red in color, then purple, then white, and is cold to the touch. In severe cases, blisters may develop. Amputation may be required in cases of severe frostbite.
Trench Foot
Trench foot, also known as immersion foot, is caused when feet are immersed in cold water at cold temperatures for long periods of time. It is similar to frostbite, but usually less severe. Symptoms include tingling, itching or burning.
Minnesota workers exposed to cold weather should take the following precautions to avoid illness or injury:
- Wear at least three layers of clothing. Wear an outer layer, such as Gortex, to break the wind. Wear a middle layer of down or wool to absorb sweat and provide insulation. Wear an inner layer of cotton or synthetic weave to allow ventilation.
- Wear a hat. Significant amounts of heat escape from the head.
- Keep an extra change of clothing. If work clothes become wet, change into dry clothes.
- Wear loose clothing. Loose clothing allows better ventilation than tight clothing.
- Don’t over-do it. Drink plenty of water to avoid dehydration. Work during warmer parts of the day if possible. Take frequent breaks out of the cold. Work in pairs. Avoid fatigue. Eat warm, high calorie food.
If you’ve sustained an on-the-job cold injury in Minnesota, you may be eligible for workers’ compensation benefits. For a free, no-obligation workers’ compensation case consultation, call at Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email.
Friday, January 20, 2012
Work Restrictions and Minnesota Workers’ Compensation FAQ’s
If you’ve sustained an on-the-job injury in Minnesota, and your doctor has advised you to limit or restrict your work and/or leisure activities, these limitations are referred to as work restrictions.
Your doctor may provide you with a workability report documenting your limitations, or may tell you to avoid doing certain activities. If you have concerns about your ability to perform your normal job activities following a work injury, it is critical that you discuss these concerns with your doctor. If your doctor tells you to restrict your work activities, you need to have your doctor provide you with a note or workability form documenting your limitations. Documentation of your work limitations must be provided to your employer. Whether an injured worker has work restrictions or not is a major factor in a Minnesota workers’ compensation case. Injured workers who have work restrictions often have questions, including:
What if I can’t do my job because of my restrictions?
If you can’t perform your normal job duties, your employer may provide you with light duty work, may make accommodations to your job duties to meet your restrictions, or they may give you an alternative assignment that is within your limitations. If your employer cannot accommodate your restrictions, and as a result, you can’t work at your regular job, you may be entitled to wage loss benefits and/or rehabilitation benefits.
I’m afraid to tell my supervisor that I have restrictions because I don’t want to lose my job, what should I do?
If you are injured at work in Minnesota, you’re required to provide documentation of any work restrictions to your employer. Failure to do so can hurt your legal rights. More importantly, however, if you continue to work outside your restrictions, you may make your injury worse. Your employer cannot fire you for having work restrictions.
My employer won’t let me come back to work unless I’m 100% cleared for duty, what should I do?
If your employer cannot provide you with light duty work and you have work restrictions because of an on-the-job injury, the workers’ compensation insurance company should be paying you wage loss benefits while you’re off work. You may also be entitled to rehabilitation assistance from a Qualified Rehabilitation Consultant. Don’t let your employer pressure you into being released to full duty before you’re ready. Returning to full-duty work before you’re physically ready to do so can adversely affect your legal rights, and more importantly, it can adversely affect your health.
My employer isn’t following my restrictions. They keep having me do work that’s outside what my doctor says I should be doing, what should I do?
Your employer cannot force you to work outside your physical restrictions, but unfortunately, some employers do it anyway. What an employee should do in this situation is dependent on the circumstances. A Minnesota workers’ compensation lawyer can help you if your employer is forcing you to perform duties that are outside your restrictions.
I’m working light duty, but I’m still having trouble doing some of my job duties even though they’re within my doctor’s restrictions, what should I do?
You should discuss the situation with the doctor and explain the job duties that are causing your problems. If appropriate, your doctor may clarify or adjust your restrictions to help you avoid those job activities that are causing you difficulty.
My restrictions are now permanent. My employer can’t provide me with a permanent light duty job. What should I do?
If you not able to return to your former employment because you have permanent restrictions as a result of a work injury, you may be eligible for wage loss benefits while you look for a new, physically suitable job. You may also be eligible for the assistance of a Qualified Rehabilitation Consultation who can provide vocational rehabilitation services or help you with a retraining plan to help you find a new, physically and economically suitable job.
I don’t have written restrictions – I’ve just been watching what I do at work and avoiding activities that cause me difficulty. Do I need written restrictions?
Written documentation of your work restrictions are ALWAYS, repeat ALWAYS, better than simply just watching what you do at work. If there’s ever a dispute about your ability to do your job, while your testimony about limiting your work activities can be used to support your claim, written documentation of your restrictions is much, much stronger. We’ve seen this situation go awry for countless injured workers. Written work restrictions go a long way towards protecting your legal rights.
My doctor has given me work restrictions, but the insurance company’s independent medical examiner says I can return to work without restrictions. What should I do?
You should speak with a Minnesota workers’ compensation attorney. If your claim has not already been denied, it will be soon. That being said, what an injured worker should do in this situation is largely based on the circumstances, and a workers’ compensation lawyer can instruct you on the best course of action. In some circumstances, the injured worker should continue to follow his or her doctor’s orders. In some circumstances, it may be appropriate for the injured worker to try to return to work and see how it goes. In some circumstances, it may be appropriate for the injured worker to undergo a Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) to get an objective measure of that worker’s limitations.
I have work restrictions due to an on-the-job injury, and I'm being laid off. Am I eligible for benefits?
In many cases, yes! Workers' compensation insurance companies often fail to tell injured workers who have restrictions, and who are laid off, that they may be eligible for wage loss benefits and/or rehabilitation benefits in the event that they are laid off or terminated. Speak with a Minnesota workers' compensation attorney to help you get the benefits you're entitled to.
I have a work injury and work restrictions, and my employer says I was terminated "for cause." What should I do?
You should contact a Minnesota workers' compensation lawyer. While Minnesota law prevents employers from terminating an employee in retaliation for filing a workers' compensation claim, unfortunately we see cases on a regular basis where an injured worker who is under restrictions suddenly becomes targeted for write-ups, discipline, and termination, after they're been hurt. Termination for misconduct can be a basis for denial of benefits in some workers' compensation cases. That being said, "termination for cause," is not the same thing as "termination for misconduct." Even when an injured worker with work restrictions has been terminated for misconduct, he or she may be entitled to wage loss and/or rehabilitation benefits.
If you have questions about your work restrictions, what rights you have if you have work restrictions, or what to do if your employer cannot accommodate your work restrictions, a Minnesota workers’ compensation lawyer can help. Call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email to schedule a free, no-obligation consultation with one of our attorneys.
Your doctor may provide you with a workability report documenting your limitations, or may tell you to avoid doing certain activities. If you have concerns about your ability to perform your normal job activities following a work injury, it is critical that you discuss these concerns with your doctor. If your doctor tells you to restrict your work activities, you need to have your doctor provide you with a note or workability form documenting your limitations. Documentation of your work limitations must be provided to your employer. Whether an injured worker has work restrictions or not is a major factor in a Minnesota workers’ compensation case. Injured workers who have work restrictions often have questions, including:
What if I can’t do my job because of my restrictions?
If you can’t perform your normal job duties, your employer may provide you with light duty work, may make accommodations to your job duties to meet your restrictions, or they may give you an alternative assignment that is within your limitations. If your employer cannot accommodate your restrictions, and as a result, you can’t work at your regular job, you may be entitled to wage loss benefits and/or rehabilitation benefits.
I’m afraid to tell my supervisor that I have restrictions because I don’t want to lose my job, what should I do?
If you are injured at work in Minnesota, you’re required to provide documentation of any work restrictions to your employer. Failure to do so can hurt your legal rights. More importantly, however, if you continue to work outside your restrictions, you may make your injury worse. Your employer cannot fire you for having work restrictions.
My employer won’t let me come back to work unless I’m 100% cleared for duty, what should I do?
If your employer cannot provide you with light duty work and you have work restrictions because of an on-the-job injury, the workers’ compensation insurance company should be paying you wage loss benefits while you’re off work. You may also be entitled to rehabilitation assistance from a Qualified Rehabilitation Consultant. Don’t let your employer pressure you into being released to full duty before you’re ready. Returning to full-duty work before you’re physically ready to do so can adversely affect your legal rights, and more importantly, it can adversely affect your health.
My employer isn’t following my restrictions. They keep having me do work that’s outside what my doctor says I should be doing, what should I do?
Your employer cannot force you to work outside your physical restrictions, but unfortunately, some employers do it anyway. What an employee should do in this situation is dependent on the circumstances. A Minnesota workers’ compensation lawyer can help you if your employer is forcing you to perform duties that are outside your restrictions.
I’m working light duty, but I’m still having trouble doing some of my job duties even though they’re within my doctor’s restrictions, what should I do?
You should discuss the situation with the doctor and explain the job duties that are causing your problems. If appropriate, your doctor may clarify or adjust your restrictions to help you avoid those job activities that are causing you difficulty.
My restrictions are now permanent. My employer can’t provide me with a permanent light duty job. What should I do?
If you not able to return to your former employment because you have permanent restrictions as a result of a work injury, you may be eligible for wage loss benefits while you look for a new, physically suitable job. You may also be eligible for the assistance of a Qualified Rehabilitation Consultation who can provide vocational rehabilitation services or help you with a retraining plan to help you find a new, physically and economically suitable job.
I don’t have written restrictions – I’ve just been watching what I do at work and avoiding activities that cause me difficulty. Do I need written restrictions?
Written documentation of your work restrictions are ALWAYS, repeat ALWAYS, better than simply just watching what you do at work. If there’s ever a dispute about your ability to do your job, while your testimony about limiting your work activities can be used to support your claim, written documentation of your restrictions is much, much stronger. We’ve seen this situation go awry for countless injured workers. Written work restrictions go a long way towards protecting your legal rights.
My doctor has given me work restrictions, but the insurance company’s independent medical examiner says I can return to work without restrictions. What should I do?
You should speak with a Minnesota workers’ compensation attorney. If your claim has not already been denied, it will be soon. That being said, what an injured worker should do in this situation is largely based on the circumstances, and a workers’ compensation lawyer can instruct you on the best course of action. In some circumstances, the injured worker should continue to follow his or her doctor’s orders. In some circumstances, it may be appropriate for the injured worker to try to return to work and see how it goes. In some circumstances, it may be appropriate for the injured worker to undergo a Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) to get an objective measure of that worker’s limitations.
I have work restrictions due to an on-the-job injury, and I'm being laid off. Am I eligible for benefits?
In many cases, yes! Workers' compensation insurance companies often fail to tell injured workers who have restrictions, and who are laid off, that they may be eligible for wage loss benefits and/or rehabilitation benefits in the event that they are laid off or terminated. Speak with a Minnesota workers' compensation attorney to help you get the benefits you're entitled to.
I have a work injury and work restrictions, and my employer says I was terminated "for cause." What should I do?
You should contact a Minnesota workers' compensation lawyer. While Minnesota law prevents employers from terminating an employee in retaliation for filing a workers' compensation claim, unfortunately we see cases on a regular basis where an injured worker who is under restrictions suddenly becomes targeted for write-ups, discipline, and termination, after they're been hurt. Termination for misconduct can be a basis for denial of benefits in some workers' compensation cases. That being said, "termination for cause," is not the same thing as "termination for misconduct." Even when an injured worker with work restrictions has been terminated for misconduct, he or she may be entitled to wage loss and/or rehabilitation benefits.
If you have questions about your work restrictions, what rights you have if you have work restrictions, or what to do if your employer cannot accommodate your work restrictions, a Minnesota workers’ compensation lawyer can help. Call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680 or click here to send us an email to schedule a free, no-obligation consultation with one of our attorneys.
Thursday, January 19, 2012
Younger Workers at Higher Risk for Work Injuries
According to a study released by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), young employees are almost twice as likely to suffer on-the-job injuries as their older co-workers. An analysis of workplace injuries among young people aged 15-24 between 1998 and 2007 revealed that 8 million young people received medical care for work injuries. Eighteen and nineteen year olds experienced work injuries most frequently.
Contact with objects or equipment was the most common cause of work-related injuries for workers of all age groups, but accounted for a larger portion of injuries among younger workers (49 percent) compared with older workers (40 percent). These injuries often involved the worker being struck by or against an object, being rubbed or abraded by a machine or object, or caught in or crushed by tools, equipment, machinery, parts, or materials.
Workplace fatality rates for younger workers were also twice as high as the rate for older workers. There were a total of 5,719 fatal injuries among workers aged 15 – 24 between the years of 1998 – 2007. Young Hispanic workers suffered fatal injuries far more frequently than black or white young workers. The greatest number of fatal injuries among young workers occurred in the services industries, the construction industries, the wholesale and retail trade sectors, and the agriculture sectors.
The report concluded that “[l]ack of job knowledge, training, and skills might contribute to increased risk among younger workers, who might be less likely to recognize hazards, less likely to speak up regarding safety, and less aware of their legal rights as workers.”
In my own experience as a Minnesota workers’ compensation lawyer, I’ve represented a number of young workers for their workers’ compensation injuries. What I’ve seen time and again, is that young workers who sustain on-the-job injuries are also far less likely to report those injuries, and to seek appropriate medical care than their older counterparts. Unfortunately, young workers who sustain on-the-job injuries are also often taken advantage of by their employers and workers’ compensation insurers, because they’re not aware of their workers’ compensation rights.
Young workers who sustain serious injuries on the job should be mindful of the fact that five years from now, ten years from now, or twenty years from now, those injuries can worsen and become disabling or require significant medical care. If you’re a young person who has sustained a work-related injury, it is extremely important to exercise your workers’ compensation rights to protect your long-term health.
We can help you navigate the complex Minnesota workers’ compensation system and make sure your future interests are protected. For a free, no-obligation case consultation, call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680, or click here to send us an email to schedule an appointment with one of our attorneys.
Contact with objects or equipment was the most common cause of work-related injuries for workers of all age groups, but accounted for a larger portion of injuries among younger workers (49 percent) compared with older workers (40 percent). These injuries often involved the worker being struck by or against an object, being rubbed or abraded by a machine or object, or caught in or crushed by tools, equipment, machinery, parts, or materials.
Workplace fatality rates for younger workers were also twice as high as the rate for older workers. There were a total of 5,719 fatal injuries among workers aged 15 – 24 between the years of 1998 – 2007. Young Hispanic workers suffered fatal injuries far more frequently than black or white young workers. The greatest number of fatal injuries among young workers occurred in the services industries, the construction industries, the wholesale and retail trade sectors, and the agriculture sectors.
The report concluded that “[l]ack of job knowledge, training, and skills might contribute to increased risk among younger workers, who might be less likely to recognize hazards, less likely to speak up regarding safety, and less aware of their legal rights as workers.”
In my own experience as a Minnesota workers’ compensation lawyer, I’ve represented a number of young workers for their workers’ compensation injuries. What I’ve seen time and again, is that young workers who sustain on-the-job injuries are also far less likely to report those injuries, and to seek appropriate medical care than their older counterparts. Unfortunately, young workers who sustain on-the-job injuries are also often taken advantage of by their employers and workers’ compensation insurers, because they’re not aware of their workers’ compensation rights.
Young workers who sustain serious injuries on the job should be mindful of the fact that five years from now, ten years from now, or twenty years from now, those injuries can worsen and become disabling or require significant medical care. If you’re a young person who has sustained a work-related injury, it is extremely important to exercise your workers’ compensation rights to protect your long-term health.
We can help you navigate the complex Minnesota workers’ compensation system and make sure your future interests are protected. For a free, no-obligation case consultation, call Meuser & Associate at 877-746-5680, or click here to send us an email to schedule an appointment with one of our attorneys.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






















